Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
So you are saying Bush subjected his war stratigies to a cost effective program?? Wow, how nice of him!! And I bet the troops on the gound love him for it..
Not at all. That's all you talking right now.
I'm saying that if he'd spent more to attempt to secure something, we'd be hearing about that instead.
380tons of HE was not looted.. What makes it even a worse outcry is it had to be an organized group that took these explosives and we had no one around to even have a clue about it..
What's even more rediculous is thinking that they were there when the bombing started. Trains were running to Syria every day before the attack.
How is a president going to goto war over WMDs but not send enough troops to contain and protect these WMDs caches from falling into the wrong hands?? Good thing we had enough troops there to protect the oil fields! They could have blown up the oil fields with those explosives!
I've got a tip for you... THEY WERE IN THE WRONG HANDS ALREADY. Maybe you could identify the wrong hands they've now fallen into and scream about what an outrage it is, then scream some more when we take them back from the "wrong hands" you claim we should have never let them fall into.
It's also important to remember that Suddam Husseign would not have given these explosives to terrorists. There is absolutely no way that would have happened. So you can rest assured, that wherever they are, they are in non threatening hands. Afterall... you've said so.