Author Topic: Uh oh, Kerry is in deep bandini now! (Read 896 times)

Nash · « **Reply #15 on:** October 26, 2004, 01:41:53 AM »

what?

Torque · « **Reply #16 on:** October 26, 2004, 02:45:40 AM »

But...but...my latitude is south of Portland.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #17 on:** October 26, 2004, 06:36:45 AM »

Clearly Bush bribed those kids with barrels of Iraqi oil.
-SW

lazs2 · « **Reply #18 on:** October 26, 2004, 07:56:51 AM »

I hear that the democrats lawyers are looking into a recount based on a lot of the poorer and dumber students not being able to read the ballot.

Did you know that not one candidate who has won the first debate has won the election?

lazs

Eagler · « **Reply #19 on:** October 26, 2004, 08:58:58 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Nash
Kids and AOLers for Bush!

hollywierd leftists, burned- out rockers, porno producers, baby murderers, the unemployed & gays for Skerry!

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #20 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:02:06 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by lazs2
I hear that the democrats lawyers are looking into a recount based on a lot of the poorer and dumber students not being able to read the ballot.

Did you know that not one candidate who has won the first debate has won the election?

lazs

I couldn't imagine Abe Lincoln losing a debate.. So I find your conclusion wrong!! haha!

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #21 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:03:27 AM »

O ya.. The pole is rigged..

AKIron · « **Reply #22 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:09:24 AM »

I hear the Democrats chief objection to the touch screen voting machines in Florida is the elimination of the possibility of a manual recount. I'm not making this up.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #23 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:11:04 AM »

I heard that the eagle on the dollar bill turns it's head to the spears when America is in a time of war. I'm not making that up either.

I hear a lot of things. The truth, however, requires more than just hearing.
-SW

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #24 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:32:16 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
I hear the Democrats chief objection to the touch screen voting machines in Florida is the elimination of the possibility of a manual recount. I'm not making this up.

lol and you would disagree with this? You dont believe the ability to recount the votes to be a valid idea??

Eagler · « **Reply #25 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:35:32 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
lol and you would disagree with this? You dont believe the ability to recount the votes to be a valid idea??

so a paper record of the electronic vote would prove what?

dang dems and their tree killing lust

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #26 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:38:13 AM »

I wrote a program in college. When you pressed one key, it gave a different output.

I don't trust anything electronic.
-SW

AKIron · « **Reply #27 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:46:28 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by TheDudeDVant
lol and you would disagree with this? You dont believe the ability to recount the votes to be a valid idea??

I think you are missing the point. With touch screen machine tabulation there is no need for a manual recount. If the machines work properly the votes will be counted far more accurately than a punch card system ever could be. Of course this removes the possibility of tampering with the "chad" which is what I believe the Democrats are really objecting to.

BTW, I'm not sure exactly how the touch screen machines work but when I voted using one on the 18th I was given a magnetic card to put into the machine which I then gave back to the poll people. I was also given a print out with my cert number. There is a vote trail here and I believe this system is probably far less vulnerable to tampering. Again, this is what I believe the Democrats object to. They've already proven that they are willing to throw around false accusations of voter intimidation freely. BTW, how many cases of voter intimidation were ever proven during the 2000 election? Not even one.

TheDudeDVant · « **Reply #28 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:47:41 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKS\/\/ulfe
I wrote a program in college. When you pressed one key, it gave a different output.

I don't trust anything electronic.
-SW

Quote

Eagler: so a paper record of the electronic vote would prove what?

Very good points.. Screw the touch screen ballots!

capt. apathy · « **Reply #29 on:** October 26, 2004, 09:57:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AKIron
I think you are missing the point. With touch screen machine tabulation there is no need for a manual recount. If the machines work properly the votes will be counted far more accurately than a punch card system ever could be. Of course this removes the possibility of tampering with the "chad" which is what I believe the Democrats are really objecting to.

BTW, I'm not sure exactly how the touch screen machines work but when I voted using one on the 18th I was given a magnetic card to put into the machine which I then gave back to the poll people. I was also given a print out with my cert number. There is a vote trail here and I believe this system is probably far less vulnerable to tampering. Again, this is what I believe the Democrats object to. They've already proven that they are willing to throw around false accusations of voter intimidation freely. BTW, how many cases of voter intimidation were ever proven during the 2000 election? Not even one.

at first I thought you were missing the point but then you semed to point out the big problem in your own argument.