a Vote for Kerry is a Vote for terror and another lost war

[Staga]

Or how about "bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... bring 'em on... " ?


Any better?

[Eagler]

Yeager

you hit a nerve .. truth hurts

LOL

[Yeager]

Ok staga you get three points to start.

Havent found any mass produced WMD factories or giant stockpiles as such, yet.  Have found lots of proof of intent to maintain capacity and proof of small one and two man science labs working to develope means of delivery for chem and bio weapons, so....at this time I will call it a draw on this one but will deduct one point from you because, well...........your european.  Bottom line, good move in Iraq.

Major combat Operations against the Iraqi military were accomplished at that time, so you lose.  One point deducted on that too.

And yes, bring them on.  Your third point deducted, you lose

[lazs2]

I don't hold anything against the guys on this BB who claim they will be voting for kerrie....  I know that they have wifes or girlfriends or canadian boyfriends who are screeching at them and watching this board...

I have every confidence tho that they will do the right thing and man up and vote for Bush when they are on their own in the polling booth.  

lazs

[RightF00T]

Originally posted by Montezuma


 

Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?

[-MZ-]

Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?

No, that is the Washington Times owner commanding his minions to write stupid anti-Kerry articles.

[hawker238]

Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?

LMFAO!

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by -MZ-
No, that is the Washington Times owner commanding his minions to write stupid anti-Kerry articles.

No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.) commanding its minions to write stupid anti-Bush articles.  Also, please note the quotes from Mohammad Amin Bashar.  Last I checked the Washington Times wasn't asking him to comment on Bush.

[-MZ-]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.)

You mean they are also owned by a bizzare cult leader who thinks he is the Second Coming of Christ?   I had no idea.

[Gh0stFT]

a Vote for Kerry is a Vote for terror and another lost war

i doubt even Kerry can turn the next 8 years into something positive.
See, only 4 years are enough to lead a nation into something,
where people today think about how to finish all this is:"Probably not in my life".

[Ripsnort]

Originally posted by -MZ-
You mean they are also owned by a bizzare cult leader who thinks he is the Second Coming of Christ?   I had no idea.

Oh, so now we get to the point of your problem with this circulation. I hear psychologists can work out those problems for you.
Care to comment on the paper quoting the source of their news story?  Didn't think so. Facts suck don't they?

[Weavling]

Originally posted by RightF00T
Are they celebrating a visit to Burger King with those hats?

   

Got a kick outta that.  

I think it's very unfair to directly corolate a vote for Kerry as support for terrorism.  It could be true that the terrorists are hoping that Kerry wins, but never the less, this comparison is unfair.  Everyone is entitled to their opinion and shouldn't be unfairly labeled as a result of their opinion.  Who knows, maybe Kerry might handle things better than Bush.  My opinion is that he won't, but no one knows for sure.

[soda72]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
No different than CBS, NYT, Washington Post, (NPR radio, etc.) commanding its minions to write stupid anti-Bush articles.  Also, please note the quotes from Mohammad Amin Bashar.  Last I checked the Washington Times wasn't asking him to comment on Bush.

Yeah, thats only the America media too...  I think the BBC considers Michael Moore as fair and balanced...

[Thrawn]

Originally posted by Ripsnort
Facts suck don't they?

Well you would definately be the one to know.  

[Silat]

Here you go. Another post in the vein of BS. It seems to be what you all like.
                   

    Mowafaq Al-Tai, a London-educated architect and intellectual, said different types of resistance fighters have different views of the U.S. election.
    The most pro-Kerry, he said, are the former Saddam Hussein loyalists — Ba'ath Party members and others who think Washington might scale back its ambitions for Iraq if Mr. Kerry wins, allowing them to re-enter civic life.
    The most pro-Bush, he said, are the foreign extremists. "They prefer Bush, because he's a provocative figure, and the more they can push people to the extreme, the better for their case."