Originally posted by Ripsnort
Your arguement is meaningless since you have no substantial proof. I have said that Kerry is a traitor to the U.S., and I will still consider him a traitor if elected. According to The Federalist petition, which can be found at http://www.kerry-04.com, Kerry's 1970 meeting in Paris with North Vietnamese Army Communists violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 104 part 904. The article states that "any person who without proper authority, knowingly...communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly...shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct."
Such an infraction clearly violates the sworn oath Kerry took when he became a military officer, to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies " and to "bear true faith and allegiance to the same."
I will enjoy bashing your president (if elected) like you have mine though! I garantee that!
This is it in a nutshell for me.
He 's traitor, pure and simple
And he did it to further his own means. (He lost his congress bid running as anti war)
So in '77 (I think it was ) he gets his dd214 amended
After review by a board of officers, he gets his honorable discharge.Was'nt that right after Carter gave a pardon to all the runners ?
Which was amended to include any "other then honorable discharges after review by a board of Officers"
I think the question of why he had a review board is in the part of the records he refuses to release.