Author Topic: Kerry/Bush? (Read 655 times)

narsus · « **Reply #15 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:39:04 PM »

agree with lazs

Nilsen · « **Reply #16 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:39:08 PM »

Kerry.

Furball · « **Reply #17 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:40:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Octavius
i'm a tard, that does not understand how to do a 1 word answer, in a 1 word answer thread, that i have already answed in.

p.s. Furball rules

How right you are!

lazs2 · « **Reply #18 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:47:55 PM »

oct... I thought I explained it very clearly but... again... if it is a close election it behoves you to make sure the democrat doesn't get in.

It is easy to follow the polls. say there is an 8 point spread... that is the time to vote libertarian. I am from CA so I would vote libertarian if there were only a 4 point spread between kerrie and Bush since my electorial vote is forfiet in any case but.... with a 2 point Bush lead... I need to vote Bush to keep the popular vote from swinging.

lazs

Thrawn · « **Reply #19 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:51:39 PM »

What Oct said.

Octavius · « **Reply #20 on:** October 28, 2004, 02:56:01 PM »

of course I understand.

I'm not playing either party's game. I don't like coke or pepsi, I want 3rd party roundy's brand lemon lime white soda (sprite, for you non-wisconsinites). If there are going to be continously close elections, and you're faced with making sure the more eeevilll candidate doesn't win each time, then there's no hope for a change. Why continue the cycle?

A third option does exist and many people know that. The sooner the votes go libertarian, the sooner we can get out of this endless cycle of a plutocracy and make it a viable third option. There is a zero to nil chance of the libertarians of even nearing 5% this election. I see it as planting seeds.

lazs2 · « **Reply #21 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:01:05 PM »

we aren't talking about soda here.... I could simply stop drinking soda and it would have no effect on my life. Soda can't take away my rights or change the constitution or appoint supreme court judges or even tax me.

It is seldom that elections are close. On the ballot I will vote on there are about a dozen and a half candidates running for office... the only real squeaker that counts is prez.... I will vote for libertarian or leave blank all the others that I don't feel offer choice.

Even presidential races aren't that close a lot of the times. You have to be a little patient and pick your fights.... it is hard to fight tho if you elect someone in protest who will take away your rights.

lazs

Maniac · « **Reply #22 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:03:30 PM »

I agree with Lazs, theres 1000´s brands of Sodas. Theres only 3 options in this election... (2 options)

You really should shutdown the "president" system. And go with a party system instead.

AKS\/\/ulfe · « **Reply #23 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:06:58 PM »

Not really Lazs, it changes the way the fight is fought though... no more pen and paper.
-SW

majic · « **Reply #24 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:07:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Octavius
When is it going to end then Lazs? If some random voter claims they're going to vote for the lesser of two evils in 2004, then what about 2008? 2012? and so on? When will they vote FOR something instead of against it? Why vote for a candidate you can't respect?

Octavius · « **Reply #25 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:12:14 PM »

LOL MAJIC

Lazs, stop drinking soda? Er, so you're saying you wouldn't vote?

If the next election is close, then I think we can see a trend developing. The only way the trend of very close elections will change is if someone majorly screws up while in office. Attempting to please all and pandering to everyone just for a wide range of votes won't keeps things placid and stale. A candidate with some actual color might stir it up a bit. Kinda like a dogfight. First one to make a mistake will see the silk sooner than the opponent. But thats beside the point.

I'm not protesting anything, and I'm not voting against anything.

Mighty1 · « **Reply #26 on:** October 28, 2004, 03:24:25 PM »

RedTop · « **Reply #27 on:** October 28, 2004, 05:20:50 PM »

midnight Target · « **Reply #28 on:** October 28, 2004, 06:00:34 PM »

Blooz · « **Reply #29 on:** October 28, 2004, 08:38:59 PM »

Pat Paulsen

It'd be tough for him to serve but he tried so hard all these years he deserves to win.

Bush really.