OK....so setting ALL political bais here I stumbled apon a pretty sturring thought tonite thanks to Kevin Costner (SP? Bad actor but seems like a good genuine person)
Anyhow, he was on the HBO show Real Time with Bill Maher (wich I actually enjoy beleive it or not) so anyways Bill and the 2 other liberal panelists (Wes Clark and that guy from Law and Order that allways wears the sunglasses) were hammering Kevin because he's a Nader supporter.
What strikes me is the fact that they weren't bashing him because he beleives in Nader but because they feel he's helping Bush win. Coster responded to the fact that he wants to vote on principles and that sometimes to acheive a goal you have to lose or realize a setback.
The statement that he made at the end of the show hit me like a ton of bricks. He basically said if Kerry wins God help him and the demacrats that they don't go after him and find coercion on his (kerry's part) to help keep Nader off the ballot. Wich I'm sure is against the law...if not very unethical.
NOW i'm not saying this has actually happend but I've heard things and it upsets me. Not because it's kerry doing it, I'd be just as disapointed in Bush if he was keeping badnarik down, but because this is partisan politics at its worst and the country will suffer.
Imagine another scandle were its the republicans going after a demacrat president and limiting his political power to accomplish anything and American troops or security suffering. I think even the more closer to center liberals on this board would agree with me on this that American needs better more/better choices in choosing our CIC.
Just a thaught