Author Topic: russian DC3s  (Read 614 times)

Offline SELECTOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2742
      • http://www.332viking.com
russian DC3s
« on: November 15, 2004, 02:36:07 PM »
Did'nt the russians build dc3s under licence from about 1937? and didn't they have top gun turrets?

if so can we get one for ah2..

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
russian DC3s
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2004, 02:53:05 PM »
Something of the sort I think.
They would be an option.
So would the Ju52. Slow but versatile, also with a top gun.
So would the Curtiss Commando. Higher speed and payload.
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
russian DC3s
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2004, 03:46:22 PM »
Yep, they called it Lisunov Li-2 and in addition it was used as bomber. The Russians used the M-62 on these planes.

gripen

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
russian DC3s
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2004, 03:51:17 PM »
The Soviets manufactured almost three thousand DC-3 variants under license. They were built under the direction of Boris Lisunov, who had acquired his education in putting together the aircraft at the Douglas Santa Monica plant during a stint there from 1936 through 1939. The type went into production as the "PS-84", meaning "Passenger Aircraft from State Factory (GAZ) 84", and was in principle to be used as a civilian airliner by Aeroflot. After the Nazi invasion of June 1941, GAZ-84 relocated to Tashkent in Central Asia, and the aircraft acquired the military designation "Li-2".

Li-2 variants included:

Li-2G: Basic civil cargo hauler, with reinforced floor and tie-downs, plus cargo doors on the left.

Li-2T: Militarized Li-2G, with a capacity of 20 troops or 15 stretchers along with the crew of four. Some were fitted with a dorsal turret with either a ShKAS 7.62 millimeter (0.30 caliber) or UBT 12.7 millimeter (0.50 caliber) machine gun, and a ShKAS machine gun could be fitted to a flexible mount on each side of the aircraft. Bomb racks could be fitted under the fuselage, with typical carriage consisting of four FAB-250 250 kilogram (550 pound) bombs, and six RS-82 82 millimeter (3.2 inch) unguided rockets could be carried under each outer wing.

edit: link added.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2004, 04:01:03 PM by Panzzer »
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
russian DC3s
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2004, 03:58:16 PM »
We DEFINATELY need the Li-2t in Aces High.  With C47s maneuverability and slow speed, it could mow down troops and light gvs all day long.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
russian DC3s
« Reply #5 on: November 15, 2004, 04:16:29 PM »
A question...
What powerplant did it have?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline oboe

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9805
russian DC3s
« Reply #6 on: November 15, 2004, 07:05:48 PM »
« Last Edit: November 15, 2004, 07:07:51 PM by oboe »

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
russian DC3s
« Reply #7 on: November 15, 2004, 10:12:13 PM »
And the Japanese had their licence built version called the Tess by the Allies.

Dan/Slack
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
russian DC3s
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2004, 04:41:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Angus
A question...
What powerplant did it have?

They used several different engines (?), but mostly the Shvetsov ASh-62 (or M-62), a 9 cylinder radial with 746 kW (1,000 HP).
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline mora

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
russian DC3s
« Reply #9 on: November 16, 2004, 05:51:07 AM »
Wasn't it considerably slower than the C47?

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
russian DC3s
« Reply #10 on: November 16, 2004, 06:57:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by mora
Wasn't it considerably slower than the C47?


I don't think that's possible. They'd be flying backwards! ;)
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
russian DC3s
« Reply #11 on: November 16, 2004, 09:52:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Guppy35
And the Japanese had their licence built version called the Tess by the Allies.

Dan/Slack

Tabby, IIRC.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-