Author Topic: Prince Charles Comments  (Read 729 times)

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #15 on: November 19, 2004, 11:08:20 AM »
Unfortunately true beetle.   Perhaps unless the Queen out lives Charles.
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Darkish

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #16 on: November 19, 2004, 11:24:09 AM »
Used to be at the top end of Romsey Rd but now at the bottom of Sleepers Hill - otherwise known as the class end of Stanmore.

I believe the brown field sites your brother may be on about used to be school playing fields - can't see them developing Winchester Royal Golf Club just yet.

It is unfortunately another symptom of this cancerous age.  God forbid the little ones get out onto a muddy pitch and try to push each other's face through the grass.  No, "little Jonathon is allergic to all physical activites and we harldy see the relevance of sports to his chosen career of camp TV chef".

Offline Furious

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3243
Re: Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2004, 11:30:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Prince Charles
..."People think they can all be pop stars, high court judges, brilliant TV personalities or infinitely more competent heads of state without ever putting in the necessary work or having natural ability," Charles wrote...


IMO, there is nothing wrong with this statement.

Offline TweetyBird

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1775
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2004, 04:02:30 PM »
I don't see a thing wrong with it.

You know how many resumes begin with "I'm a people person"

Oh my, then we must hire you! We've been plagued with non-people persons.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2004, 04:27:59 PM »
There is alot wrong with it coming from someone who has never had to compete for a thing in his life. His opinion on others asperations to improve themselves is the height of stupidity and dishonesty. He would not dream of limiting his own or his families postiions to just what they earned. The very concept would be alien to him.
That he thinks such things is not supprising of course. That he uses such reasoning in his human resource practices of his tax payer funded orginisation is of course very interesting.

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2004, 04:50:46 PM »
I heard about a guy who was just mediocre in the school (almost dropped from grade school...) and worked later at patent office as a clerk.
His name was Einstein or something like that; I heard he become quite smart later.

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2004, 05:29:18 PM »
Why dont you Brits axe the monarchy and build a DisneyWorld with the savings!  :)

Offline Darkish

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #22 on: November 19, 2004, 05:51:42 PM »
Pongo -  the Royal family earns more than it gets

If you were in Charle's positiobn, would you have the balls to say what you felt?

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #23 on: November 19, 2004, 06:16:58 PM »
He didnt say it.
He wrote it in a memo about insisting one of his employees didnt need a promotion.
It took no balls to do what he did. Just a rediculous world view that ignores his situation.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #24 on: November 19, 2004, 06:27:14 PM »
Quote
His opinion on others asperations to improve themselves is the height of stupidity and dishonesty.


I think the point is he wasn't talking about people's desire to improve themselves, he was addressing the attitude that people can be good at any job without having to improve themselves.

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2004, 12:24:04 AM »
So is this a case study against inbreeding?


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2004, 08:35:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Darkish
Used to be at the top end of Romsey Rd but now at the bottom of Sleepers Hill - otherwise known as the class end of Stanmore.

I believe the brown field sites your brother may be on about used to be school playing fields - can't see them developing Winchester Royal Golf Club just yet.
Darkish - don't know if you get the Hampshire Chronicle - if you do, look out for my brother's letter about Infill Development - may be in this week, possibly next week.

Offline Momus--

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2004, 09:10:27 AM »
There are some interesting parallels between the US and UK heads of state.

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

Child of a previous head of state.
Born into a rich establishment family.
No obvious talents to speak of.
Wasn't elected to current job.

George W Bush

Child of a previous head of state.
Born into a rich establishment family.
No obvious talents to speak of.
Wasn't elected to current job.

:lol

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #28 on: December 03, 2004, 03:56:50 PM »
The funny thing about the Prince's statements is that he's absolutely correct.  He's railing against people who have no training, skill, or qualifications, who are saying they have the same right to hold difficult or high paying jobs as someone who is better trained, better educated, has more skill, or who has put in the time to become qualified to do that specific job.

He's right, and the damned liberal socialist "equality" loudmouths who apparently aren't qualified to do anything but gripe about what the Prince says, are making a big deal out of nothing.  When an uneducated loser shows up expecting a job as a handout when he's done nothing to earn the position or prepare himself for a job with some responsibilities, he can go suck an egg and I'll give the job to someone who cares enough to be prepared.

But of course to the tabloid press and the commie pinko masses, that's an elitist old-world attitude and it simply isn't progressive enough for our current enlightened society.  Those loudmouths are having to take great lengths to avoid the fact that Prince Charles has spent an enormous amount of time and effort furthering basic education and skills training programs to address the very issue he brought up in the memo, but again the idea that an ignorant lazy slacker isn't equal in every way to an Oxford grad is elitist and worthy of a media frenzy.

The soviet union tried that...  It didn't work too well even before Reagan decided we were going to bankrupt one of the richest (in natural resources) countries in the world.  If the Soviets had recognized personal ability and training or Karl Marx had worked an ability-based status mechanism into his theories, they'd probably own most of the world by now.

But it's fun to bash the royals and anyone in power, and the stupider the general population gets, the more idiotic tabloids they buy, and the more they're flooded with idiotic attacks against anything that is rational in the world.  The cute phrase "reading that magazine just made me stupider" isn't a joke when it comes to the most popular rags in the US and England.  People believe this stuff because it's so hard to read things that actually make sense, they just read and believe whatever is printed in the tabloids and call it "news".
« Last Edit: December 03, 2004, 04:08:07 PM by eagl »
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.

Offline eagl

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6769
Prince Charles Comments
« Reply #29 on: December 03, 2004, 04:06:07 PM »
Pongo,

You really ought to read exactly what he said.  He didn't say people shouldn't rise above their positions.  He didn't say that people shouldn't improve their lot in life.  He didn't say that people should not go out and get education and training.

He said the exact opposite.  He said it's stupid for people with no training, education, or skills to expect to get jobs that either require training, education or skills, or who have a pool of applicants who are better trained, educated, or skilled.

Not only did he say that people need to improve themselves if they want to get better jobs, he has sponsored and supported many education and training programs throughout his life.  Those programs do exactly what he's been accused of trying to halt - They take less fortunate and less educated people and train/educate them until they are qualified to fill better jobs.

It sounds so damn good to slam the royals that people are willing to believe outright lies about what the royals (and other politicians) say just because it makes them look like elitist bastards.  Maybe it's jealousy that makes so many people so willing to believe anything bad that's said about these leaders even when it's so easy to do a little research to determine the truth, but that's where we are, both in the US and in England.  Sure, our leaders deserve a little poking now and then, but holy cow people are pretty damn stupid when they're so eager to jump all over Prince Charles when some rat bastard working for some crappy little tabloid makes up some disinformation about a memo the Prince wrote, because it will increase his paper's circulation.
Everyone I know, goes away, in the end.