Author Topic: Iran and it's Nukes (Read 994 times)

Octavius · « **Reply #45 on:** November 21, 2004, 01:47:22 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by CAVY
I give you the Casey situation...however I'n not buying the propping up of the Sha...The US chose the lesser of two evils and picked the Sha..which mind has nothing to do with Iraq today

What do you mean you dont buy it? You're choosing to remain ignorant simply because you want to deny the actual events that lead up to the current situation?

Thats like saying Mexico has nothing to do with the Texas border in present day.

Your arguement makes no sense if you flat out refuse to even consider what Babek said. There's a lot of grey out there - nothing is black and white. Until you atleast consider other arguments, you have zero chance of winning by claiming "I dont buy it." A vast majority don't care if you buy it or not, you're simply reinforcing your choice to remain in the dark.

CAVY · « **Reply #46 on:** November 21, 2004, 05:02:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Octavius
What do you mean you dont buy it? You're choosing to remain ignorant simply because you want to deny the actual events that lead up to the current situation?

Thats like saying Mexico has nothing to do with the Texas border in present day.

Your arguement makes no sense if you flat out refuse to even consider what Babek said. There's a lot of grey out there - nothing is black and white. Until you atleast consider other arguments, you have zero chance of winning by claiming "I dont buy it." A vast majority don't care if you buy it or not, you're simply reinforcing your choice to remain in the dark.

AHHHH.Go Back to Richard Simmons

TigerStolly · « **Reply #47 on:** November 21, 2004, 05:39:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by CAVY
AHHHH.Go Back to Richard Simmons

HMMMMMMM I'm not listening HMMMMMMMMM

lol

What does someone of Iranian descent know about Iran anyway ?

Octavius · « **Reply #48 on:** November 21, 2004, 06:13:48 PM »

He is my idol.

cpxxx · « **Reply #49 on:** November 22, 2004, 02:42:37 AM »

There is no 'Iran problem'. Iran is already a working democracy (flawed) and does not need 'liberating'. It is not much of a threat to it's neighbours either except Israel and little enough to them.

If any lesson was learned from Iraq, it's the difficulty in controlling a small minority of rebels even when a large part of the population welcomed the removal of Saddam. Imagine trying to control Iran with the whole country in rebellion to an occupation?

No Iran like North Korea will be left severely alone at least militarily. Politics will decide their future.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #50 on:** November 22, 2004, 07:20:46 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by cpxxx
There is no 'Iran problem'. Iran is already a working democracy (flawed) and does not need 'liberating'. It is not much of a threat to it's neighbours either except Israel and little enough to them.

If any lesson was learned from Iraq, it's the difficulty in controlling a small minority of rebels even when a large part of the population welcomed the removal of Saddam. Imagine trying to control Iran with the whole country in rebellion to an occupation?

No Iran like North Korea will be left severely alone at least militarily. Politics will decide their future.

Actually a very large portion of the population was pro USA right up to to the point where Bush included Iran in his Axis of Evil speach
Including Iran. OR I should say saying "Iran" instead of Saying "the government of..." was a major blunder on his part.

DREDIOCK · « **Reply #51 on:** November 22, 2004, 07:32:20 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by WhiteHawk
2 weeks of battle and the reports are over 2000 dead insurgents.

"According to US military figures, more than 1,200 insurgents have been killed in the intense fighting, as well as 51 US troops and eight Iraqi personnel."

Source