« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: buh bye Dan  (Read 769 times)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
buh bye Dan
« Reply #15 on: November 23, 2004, 04:11:05 PM »
The BBC had an entirely erronious piece on crime in great briton according to beetle.   I was completely tainted and the actual home office figures seem to bear out beetle.... If they are wrong and sensationalizing about that then how many other things are they agendizing?

lazs
Logged

Offline Holden McGroin

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8591
buh bye Dan
« Reply #16 on: November 23, 2004, 05:53:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by beet1e
Why don't you like him?

The anchorpersons I remember when I lived there were Dan Rather, Fahey Flynn, Ted Koppel, Sam Donaldson, Linda Yu, Connie Chung - hehe, always remember the Kathleen Gingrich debacle. :lol A lot of those anchorpersons still seem to be around.


Ted Baxter was better than all those...

« Last Edit: November 23, 2004, 06:39:32 PM by Holden McGroin »
Logged
Holden McGroin LLC makes every effort to provide accurate and complete information. Since humor, irony, and keen insight may be foreign to some readers, no warranty, expressed or implied is offered. Re-writing this disclaimer cost me big bucks at the lawyer’s office!

Offline LePaul

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7988
buh bye Dan
« Reply #17 on: November 23, 2004, 05:59:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Because they didn't report the news...they slanted the wording, raised an eyebrow at the right time, basically pulled a Goebells in the name of their own political party.  Most news anchors today on the major networks are guilty of it.  Thus, my philosophy of "Get as much news from as many sources available, sort through all the crap, and make the decision yourself of what is reported correctly, and what isn't."


Good example was mentioned today on the Howie Carr show.  When Clinton was running for re-election in 1996, a 5.5% Unemployment rate was good for the country.  In 2004, with Bush running for re-election, a 5.5% Unemployment issue was a big issue for Dan & Co.

He got caught over and over again, their credibility and ratings (News Wise) are in the tank.  Better to run CSI re-runs at 6:30

:p
Logged

Offline CAVY

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 215
buh bye Dan
« Reply #18 on: November 23, 2004, 06:30:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LePaul
Good example was mentioned today on the Howie Carr show.  When Clinton was running for re-election in 1996, a 5.5% Unemployment rate was good for the country.  In 2004, with Bush running for re-election, a 5.5% Unemployment issue was a big issue for Dan & Co.

He got caught over and over again, their credibility and ratings (News Wise) are in the tank.  Better to run CSI re-runs at 6:30

:p


:aok :aok :aok :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl

beutiful!!!!
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
buh bye Dan
« Reply #19 on: November 23, 2004, 06:55:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
In other words, they did'nt have the opinion you wanted. Watch Fox, read Drudge and Newsmax for the correct opinion and proper eyebrow raising.


Quote
Originally posted by LePaul
Good example was mentioned today on the Howie Carr show.  When Clinton was running for re-election in 1996, a 5.5% Unemployment rate was good for the country.  In 2004, with Bush running for re-election, a 5.5% Unemployment issue was a big issue for Dan & Co.

He got caught over and over again, their credibility and ratings (News Wise) are in the tank.  Better to run CSI re-runs at 6:30

:p


I;ve given Mr.RPM many many examples of liberal bias over the years, Lepaul, but when you have sand in your ears, you don't hear a damned thing. :lol
Logged

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
buh bye Dan
« Reply #20 on: November 23, 2004, 09:55:51 PM »
Yeah, I take hate radio entertainment hosts seriously. Was this guy on Oxycontin, too?
Logged
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
buh bye Dan
« Reply #21 on: November 23, 2004, 10:33:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Flit
good riddence


LOL! He just got promoted! He'll still run CBS news, but you will not see him on TV

:lol
Logged

Offline JBA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1797
buh bye Dan
« Reply #22 on: November 23, 2004, 10:38:12 PM »
All 6 of his viewers will miss him.
Logged
"They effect the march of freedom with their flash drives.....and I use mine for porn. Viva La Revolution!". .ZetaNine  03/06/08
"I'm just a victim of my own liberalhoodedness"  Midnight Target

Offline Gunslinger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10084
buh bye Dan
« Reply #23 on: November 24, 2004, 12:42:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
Yeah, I take hate radio entertainment hosts seriously. Was this guy on Oxycontin, too?


Would it matter what anyone was on when facts are facts?
Logged

Offline EN4CER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
buh bye Dan
« Reply #24 on: November 24, 2004, 10:59:04 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Because they didn't report the news...they slanted the wording, raised an eyebrow at the right time, basically pulled a Goebells in the name of their own political party.  Most news anchors today on the major networks are guilty of it.  Thus, my philosophy of "Get as much news from as many sources available, sort through all the crap, and make the decision yourself of what is reported correctly, and what isn't."


Well said Rip! :aok

Rather's going out on a real high note too - too lazy to check his sources and facts - Time for the GOLDEN BOOT :lol
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »