Netherlands Euthanizes Babies

[JBA]

http://apnews.myway.com/article/20041130/D86MEAA80.html

Netherlands Hospital Euthanizes Babies

Sounds a bit like nazi Germany, in search of the perfect race. Can’t have anybody that needs too much medical attention that might cost too much.

Conversion between to Dutch.

I got an idea lets kill them,

But wait we don’t like the death penalty for murders.

But their not murders their babies.

O okay then, that’s fine.
----------------------------------------------

and Europeans say we're the Neanderthals.
Your secular society is crumbling from with in.
Don't come calling 1-800-USA-HELP when you have collapsed.

[JBA]

I re-read the article and I'm even angrier then before, you barbaric pigs.

What’s more disturbing is the movement in our liberal courts to site European law as "world opinion” and applying it to our constitution i.e. death penalty.

[Urchin]

Is english your first language?  

You might get more replies if people could figure out what the hell you are talking about.

[AKS\/\/ulfe]

He doesn't know what he's talking about, hence the jibberish.
-SW

[vorticon]

Originally posted by Urchin
Is english your first language?  

You might get more replies if people could figure out what the hell you are talking about.

thats why he included the link...

[Nilsen]

Your hat is on too tight there JBA.

[lasersailor184]

Basically, it comes down to the idea that Doctors should be able to decide whether or not to kill those who can't mentally decide whether or not they want to euthanize themselves.  I.E. Birth Defect babies, mentally retarded, people in a Coma...



I would read the article again for all those people it encompasses, but I get more pissed off each time I read it.

[Rude]

A billboard of Bush upsets you liberal pinheads, however, killing babies does not.

You must be so proud of yourselves.

[Saintaw]

The guideline says euthanasia is acceptable when the child's medical team and independent doctors agree the pain cannot be eased and there is no prospect for improvement, and when parents think it's best.

Examples include extremely premature births, where children suffer brain damage from bleeding and convulsions; and diseases where a child could only survive on life support for the rest of its life, such as severe cases of spina bifida and epidermosis bullosa, a rare blistering illness.

I see nothing wrong with this. As a matter of fact, I would find it 'barbaric' to think of it otherwise. (to use your own words)

[Urchin]

I'd make a coherent reply Rude, but I'm behind on my quota of killed babies today...  

I'll talk to you later

[AKS\/\/ulfe]

I am proud of myself, a dead fetus is a lot on the black market these days.
-SW

[slimm50]

"Slippery Slope, Slippery Slope."

What's next?  Who gets to expand/redefine the parameters that this sort of ruling applies to, I wonder. Because you know that over time the rules will change, and not for the better.

[Rude]

Originally posted by Urchin
I'd make a coherent reply Rude, but I'm behind on my quota of killed babies today...  

I'll talk to you later

Hiyas Urch!:)

[Seeker]

Originally posted by JBA
I re-read the article and I'm even angrier then before, you barbaric pigs.

I agree:

However, experts acknowledge that doctors euthanize routinely in the United States and elsewhere, but that the practice is hidden.

Pigs indeed! I'd much  rather it happend on the sly with out independant review.

[Rude]

Originally posted by Seeker
I agree:

However, experts acknowledge that doctors euthanize routinely in the United States and elsewhere, but that the practice is hidden.

Pigs indeed! I'd much  rather it happend on the sly with out independant review.

The United States does nothing even close to what is happening in Europe....an empty accusation with no proof.

I'm waiting stone thrower.