Author Topic: US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??  (Read 339 times)


Offline Flit

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1035
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2004, 11:59:21 PM »
Defence science board?
 What the hell is that ?
 Did Rumsfield ever see this "report"?

Offline Gh0stFT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1736
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2004, 02:15:33 AM »
thats nothing new.
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

Offline -dead-

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
“The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” --  Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, June 5, 2006.

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2004, 04:51:51 AM »
Interesting and sad reading but nothing new.

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2004, 10:00:47 AM »
That dammed liberal Pentagon.

Charon

Offline TheDudeDVant

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2429
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #6 on: December 09, 2004, 10:48:17 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Charon
That dammed liberal Pentagon.

Charon
:lol :lol :lol

Offline -dead-

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
US admits the war for ‘hearts and minds’ in Iraq is now lost..??
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2004, 01:03:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Charon
That dammed liberal Pentagon.

Charon
And those pinkos in the CIA too, it would appear: CIA adds to gloom over Iraq
“The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” --  Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, June 5, 2006.

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
What's the sad part?
« Reply #8 on: December 09, 2004, 01:32:05 PM »
I see the report as a (somewhat) biased attempt to improve our communications (and thereby our image) with other countries.  The result of this kind of study is a foregone conclusion, when you factor in that they are TRYING to find problems in the area of interest.  If they found none, they would not be able to justify the whole effort.

Guys, this comes down to one statement:

"If we sold ourselves better, everybody would like us."

That is naive, and incorrect IMO.  A bunch of communications specialists got together, and decided we need a new communications beaurocracy to improve our propaganda!  What a concept!  Government jobs for professional spokespersons!  Staffs!  Editors!  Power over the words and statements of others!  

A crock.  That's what it is.