Author Topic: I'm going to write a book "The Iraq War For Dummies" (Read 3181 times)

patrone · « **Reply #90 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:09:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
They don't need to. The last I knew, the USA wasn't governed by the UN. This isn't Norway, after all.

Then it means breaking international law. And of course, this you have the full right to do, but also to take the concequnce from doing so. It might take a while to enforce...........after a second thought.

Martlet · « **Reply #91 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:10:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by patrone
Then it means breaking international law. And of course, this you have the full right to do, but also to take the concequnce from doing so. It might take a while to enforce...........after a second thought.

International law? I don't recall the US being charged with anything by any legitimate courts.

Martlet · « **Reply #92 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:11:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
UN Charter.

The Charter is a treaty?

Martlet · « **Reply #93 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:14:16 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Yes.

No

patrone · « **Reply #94 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:21:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
International law? I don't recall the US being charged with anything by any legitimate courts.

Well, it is not like Allawi will hand in a complaint. But I am sure, he is not the last one that will govern Iraq.
And to be honest, you are right, if USA was charged, it is up to USA to recognize its jurisdiction (international court of law). Then again that would also mean a serie of other things........

patrone · « **Reply #95 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:28:57 PM »

Oh..........

JB88 · « **Reply #96 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:34:22 PM »

ahhhhh.

like a warm ray of truth peeking out from behind the mushroom cloud.

i feel tingly.

patrone · « **Reply #97 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:36:23 PM »

Now martlet, only one thing can save you from disgrace, to admit defeat or start the "namecalling game",,,,:lol

Raider179 · « **Reply #98 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:37:13 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Gunslinger
narrow minded

Its ok I understand you are upset I shot down your website.

Ok guns who is the #2 threat to the U.S. that we should be so worried about?

Got any particular group in mind?
Abu sayaf? Hamas? Al-ansqa?

what you call narrow minded I call focused and I can see that you are just another person on this BBS that uses name calling when they cant prove their point.

Martlet · « **Reply #99 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:41:09 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Yes.

"The United Nations Charter is the constitution of the United Nations. It was signed at San Francisco on June 26, 1945 by the 50 original member countries. It entered into force on October 24, 1945, after being ratified by the five founding members—the Republic of China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States—and a majority of the other signatories.

As a treaty, all signatories are bound by international law to obey the provisions of the Charter. Furthermore, it explicitly says that the Charter trumps all other treaty obligations. It was ratified by the United States on August 8, 1945, making that nation the first to join the new international organization."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Charter

widipedia as a source? A medium where the user writes the article?

HAHAHAHA!

It's signatories are "bound by international law" but nobody else is? Heck, the user that wrote that didn't put much thought into it. Or did you just whip it up so you could post it?

Try again.

patrone · « **Reply #100 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:41:56 PM »

GS, så jävla gott att se, nu fick han så han teg...hahahahaha

JB88 · « **Reply #101 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:42:06 PM »

Martlet · « **Reply #102 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:47:24 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by GScholz
Führer Garanties ... I'm sorry Martlet, I'm not an Indian. I'm not buying.

You don't have to buy. It's fact. Now it's correct.

Quote

As a Charter, but not a treaty, all signatories are bound by nothing. Furthermore, it explicitly says that the Charter trumps all other treaty obligations. It was ratified by the United States on August 8, 1945, making that nation the first to join the new international organization. And GScholtz is ghey. .

See how easy that was? It came from wikipedia, it must be true.

patrone · « **Reply #103 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:49:14 PM »

Maybe you should look up the UN-Charter by your own, to see if it´s correct, Martlet?

Martlet · « **Reply #104 on:** January 21, 2005, 06:50:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by patrone
Maybe you should look up the UN-Charter by your own, to see if it´s correct, Martlet?

I just did. Right at the link GScholtz posted, that you all took as legitimate. It specifically states that it isn't a treaty.