Originally posted by Martlet They don't need to. The last I knew, the USA wasn't governed by the UN. This isn't Norway, after all.
Originally posted by patrone Then it means breaking international law. And of course, this you have the full right to do, but also to take the concequnce from doing so. It might take a while to enforce...........after a second thought.
Originally posted by GScholz UN Charter.
Originally posted by GScholz Yes.
Originally posted by Martlet International law? I don't recall the US being charged with anything by any legitimate courts.
Originally posted by Gunslinger narrow minded
Originally posted by GScholz Yes."The United Nations Charter is the constitution of the United Nations. It was signed at San Francisco on June 26, 1945 by the 50 original member countries. It entered into force on October 24, 1945, after being ratified by the five founding members—the Republic of China, France, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States—and a majority of the other signatories.As a treaty, all signatories are bound by international law to obey the provisions of the Charter. Furthermore, it explicitly says that the Charter trumps all other treaty obligations. It was ratified by the United States on August 8, 1945, making that nation the first to join the new international organization."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Charter
Originally posted by GScholz Führer Garanties ... I'm sorry Martlet, I'm not an Indian. I'm not buying.
As a Charter, but not a treaty, all signatories are bound by nothing. Furthermore, it explicitly says that the Charter trumps all other treaty obligations. It was ratified by the United States on August 8, 1945, making that nation the first to join the new international organization. And GScholtz is ghey. .
Originally posted by patrone Maybe you should look up the UN-Charter by your own, to see if it´s correct, Martlet?