Author Topic: Peter Jackson question  (Read 1695 times)

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #75 on: January 13, 2005, 05:10:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
I have read your posts carefully, your repeated whining to the contrary is old and frail.

I must have missed anyone who loves the books saying the hate the movies. I certainly love the movies. But it is sad to those of us who know the story by reading it(not reasearching it) that the story was changed(weakend) for no reason. But if you learn the chicks version of the tale first you will never realize that.

I would hazard that no one who loves the books is totaly satisfied with the changes that PJ and the chicks made to the story line in the way of embelishment. where they had to cut they had to cut. Where they changed the fundimental motivations and relationships of the characters they failed.
But its a good movie. People without the attention span to read the books can now considerthemselves tolkein scholars by "researching" the books instead of reading them. Thats progress.


Ummm, no, you most defintiely qualify as a TN.  There isn't a passage of whining in a single line of my posts.  Your adherence to your mypic stance is getting most tiresome.  Esp. the "those of us who know the story by reading (not researching..." is a TN comment if I've ever seen.  And I have never said, written, or quoted myself as a "Tolkien scholar".  You sir, are the very reason why some of us who don't like to read fantasy, as I stated earlier but I guess you missed that on your "read your posts carefully" claim.  For someone who states to have read Tolkien, and I am not saying you haven't, it is quite illuminating to see don't understand the difference between what you think you have read and what is written.  But like I said, if you want to keep arguing, keep barking little doggie.  Just a little reminder, it wasn't me that changed the subject of this thread.  Again, to make it clear to you, the point of this thread is....

Do you think Peter Jackson can make the The Silmarillion into a movie?  

It's actually quite simple, as I've said before...
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #76 on: January 13, 2005, 08:01:01 AM »
The first time I read LOTR was in about 1972.  I have actually worn out two sets (paperback) of the work, rereading and rereading it.  The movies did a pretty good job, within the limits of Hollyweird political correctness.

Were they perfect?  NO way. Were they enjoyable?  Absolutely.  Tolkein's works are approachable from many directions--you can look at it from a "sword and sorcery" aspect, a moralist aspect, and about any other way you want.  From each viewpoint the story seems a little different.  What we got in the movies was PJ's interpretation.

Naturally, it won't agree with everything everybody else sees in the story.

Offline takeda

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 514

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #78 on: January 20, 2005, 06:39:23 PM »
You have any more?
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline takeda

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #79 on: January 20, 2005, 06:43:03 PM »
Just had those links, but I just found where they came from:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=1416950

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #80 on: January 20, 2005, 08:07:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Ummm, no, you most defintiely qualify as a TN.  There isn't a passage of whining in a single line of my posts.  Your adherence to your mypic stance is getting most tiresome.  Esp. the "those of us who know the story by reading (not researching..." is a TN comment if I've ever seen.  And I have never said, written, or quoted myself as a "Tolkien scholar".  You sir, are the very reason why some of us who don't like to read fantasy, as I stated earlier but I guess you missed that on your "read your posts carefully" claim.  For someone who states to have read Tolkien, and I am not saying you haven't, it is quite illuminating to see don't understand the difference between what you think you have read and what is written.  But like I said, if you want to keep arguing, keep barking little doggie.  Just a little reminder, it wasn't me that changed the subject of this thread.  Again, to make it clear to you, the point of this thread is....

Do you think Peter Jackson can make the The Silmarillion into a movie?  

It's actually quite simple, as I've said before...


Your right. Im not sure what your saying at all now. except that I am a Tolkien Nazi because I read the books to form my opinion of them and your somehow cool because you lack the attention span to do so.

No he could not make it into a movie. But how do I explain why to a person that cant even read the thing?
He could make a movie and call it the silmarillion which would no doubt entertain you..and it might be a great movie. But he could not make a movie of the story that is told in the silmariion.
If you read the things you wouldnt ask the question.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2005, 08:10:39 PM by Pongo »

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Peter Jackson question
« Reply #81 on: January 20, 2005, 08:16:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by takeda
Oh, those silly fanboys...
http://img84.exs.cx/img84/672/fanboi9xm.gif


These are funny:
1: http://img77.exs.cx/img77/2888/catapult1id.gif

2: http://img70.exs.cx/img70/3483/catapult7kc.gif


the second two made me cry.
the first one was dumb