Originally posted by Eagler
if skerry had won and had said the same thing, the left would be falling all over themselves saying what a historic speech it was...
it was a great speech, delivery was a bit rough (norm) but the content can not be disputed
Actually the content can be disputed quite easily.
For instance he said "From now on, he said, his administration will not "ignore" or "excuse" oppression in any country"
So does that include US allies that fail to measure up to his freedom standards like - Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan, which get lousy ratings on human rights from the US State Department but are counted as allies in the war on terrorism.
What about Russia? Putin has been busy dismantling anything resembling a democratic institution in Russia and reasserting authoritarian rule. Then there's China, whose growing economic power and influence with North Korea make it easy for Bush to "excuse" Beijing's human rights record.
Personally I thought it was a very poor speech poorly delivered as always. No wonder the guy had a heart attack.
...-Gixer