Author Topic: Bush loves his role in history (Read 1662 times)

Raider179 · « **Reply #90 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:45:24 PM »

hmmm maybe this

Jones had accused Clinton of exposing himself to her in a Little Rock hotel room in 1991, a year prior to his ascension to the presidency. Her suit was dismissed in 1998 by Wright, who said Clinton's alleged behavior, while it might have been "boorish," would not have met the legal standard of sexual harassment

Martlet · « **Reply #91 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:47:03 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raider179
hmmm maybe this

Jones had accused Clinton of exposing himself to her in a Little Rock hotel room in 1991, a year prior to his ascension to the presidency. Her suit was dismissed in 1998 by Wright, who said Clinton's alleged behavior, while it might have been "boorish," would not have met the legal standard of sexual harassment

BZZZZZZZZ!

Thanks for playing. Maybe try looking it up and answering again?

koda76 · « **Reply #92 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:47:21 PM »

Not in the workplace......ta-da....

Raider179 · « **Reply #93 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:53:28 PM »

Disbarred for giving misleading evidence during paula jones testimony?

Martlet · « **Reply #94 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:57:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raider179
Disbarred for giving misleading evidence during paula jones testimony?

yep. Lying under oath.

Raider179 · « **Reply #95 on:** January 27, 2005, 03:59:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet
yep. Lying under oath.

aha now I see why you edited out perjury. nice one

my argument was never that he didnt do it. It was that it was an insignifigant thing to lie about.

Martlet · « **Reply #96 on:** January 27, 2005, 04:19:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raider179
aha now I see why you edited out perjury. nice one

my argument was never that he didnt do it. It was that it was an insignifigant thing to lie about.

I didn't edit out perjury. I was wrong when I said perjury, so I corrected it.

So it's ok to lie about insignifcant things? Who determines what is or isn't insignificant?

Raider179 · « **Reply #97 on:** January 27, 2005, 04:35:49 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Martlet

So it's ok to lie about insignifcant things? Who determines what is or isn't insignificant?

thats a whole nother thread

Martlet · « **Reply #98 on:** January 27, 2005, 04:39:40 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raider179
thats a whole nother thread

You brought it into this one. Answer the question.

Raider179 · « **Reply #99 on:** January 27, 2005, 04:41:15 PM »

no its not ok to lie about anything but it doesnt mean he should have lost the presidency either

not you or me

Martlet · « **Reply #100 on:** January 27, 2005, 04:41:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Raider179
Fine not you or me

Then who?

lada · « **Reply #101 on:** January 27, 2005, 05:11:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by JB88
history teachers will.

much like caligula.

but will the senate let the horse in? only time will tell.

well caligua had some sexual features.... thats diferent story