Author Topic: What are are choices with N Korea? (Read 1572 times)

Toad · « **Reply #15 on:** February 12, 2005, 11:27:52 AM »

I say we wait until they are starving and Kim launches a nuclear attack on the US.

Then we can just glass over all of NK and the world and our Euro buddies will sadly sake their collective heads and say "it had to be done".

And if we lose LA or SFO.... well, double bonus round I guess. Too bad the wind blows West to East though.

NUKE · « **Reply #16 on:** February 12, 2005, 11:28:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
And? IIRC also Iraq had WMDs ?

you are correct, they did have WMD.

1.5 tons of VX nerve gas has never been accounted for.....even the mighty Hans Blix couldn't find it.

Otto · « **Reply #17 on:** February 12, 2005, 12:22:16 PM »

What are our choices with N Korea?

Himmm.....? Lets start by putting LSD in their water supply and then project a life size Hologram of Godzilla coming out of the Ocean while singing "These boots are made for walking......"

That just for 'starters...'

Staga · « **Reply #18 on:** February 12, 2005, 12:24:49 PM »

So is GWB full of it or man of action? Is he going to live up his words?

How many of US citizens are willing to go to a war against NK ?
I think there's many in this board who are willing to join the army and help cleanse NK from their WMDs?

Nuke are you too old already? Yeager?

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #19 on:** February 12, 2005, 12:51:33 PM »

Better let NK bleed to death coz their communistic system will fall apart in the end.
Anyway war would suit the NK leader well as its sets away the focus on their real internal problems.

Having patience is the most tactical thing u could do right now.

Suave · « **Reply #20 on:** February 12, 2005, 01:12:40 PM »

NK will realise that nuclear weapons are not going to be effective in extorting money from rich nations and they will switch to a different tactic. As it is now this tactic is only succeeding in alienating them from the entire world. NK leadership and people are not insane, they don't want to die.

One great thing about nuclear weapons is that leaders realise if they go to war it's their own life in mortal danger.

Halo · « **Reply #21 on:** February 12, 2005, 01:27:23 PM »

Right on, Suave.

TweetyBird · « **Reply #22 on:** February 12, 2005, 01:30:24 PM »

>>NK leadership and people are not insane,<<

Well maybe, maybe not...

"South Korean sources claim that Kim Jong-Il was born on February 16, 1941, and that subsequently his "official" birth year was adjusted so as to be in harmony in terms of decades with that of his father, Kim Il-sung."

"Before his accession to power, Kim Jong-il was frequently accused of dishonesty, drunkenness, sexual excess of various kinds and even *insanity* [emphasis mine], particularly in the South Korean press. While this is not an uncommon pattern of behavior in the sons of dictators (see Vasily Stalin, Nicu Ceausescu, Tommy Suharto and Uday and Qusay Hussein), at least some of these accusations seem to have been fabricated by the Korean Central Intelligence Agency (KCIA) of South Korea.

Some of these stories, however, come from defectors from the DPRK whose accounts have some credibility."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Jong_Il

Elfie · « **Reply #23 on:** February 12, 2005, 01:40:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Otto
What are our choices with N Korea?

Himmm.....? Lets start by putting LSD in their water supply and then project a life size Hologram of Godzilla coming out of the Ocean while singing "These boots are made for walking......"

That just for 'starters...'

EagleEyes · « **Reply #24 on:** February 12, 2005, 03:06:10 PM »

Personally i think we are screwed. If we wait too long they could sneak nukes in US and then its too late, if we go to war with them, im about 90% sure that they would launch missiles at us with nukes. I am definetly going to be following this story closely over the next year because i plan on going into the Air Force and how we deal with NK will affect what happened to me when i join the USAF. Ill either be sent to SK, Japan or in Europe.

lada · « **Reply #25 on:** February 12, 2005, 03:26:11 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Reschke
Well the choices are simple. Option A: Special ops activity targeting high value military and civilian targets including government leaders.

I say that all the time. Terrorism is way to go.

NUKE · « **Reply #26 on:** February 12, 2005, 04:03:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
So is GWB full of it or man of action? Is he going to live up his words?

How many of US citizens are willing to go to a war against NK ?
I think there's many in this board who are willing to join the army and help cleanse NK from their WMDs?

Nuke are you too old already? Yeager?

When did Bush ever say that the US was going to attack every nation who had WMD?

You obviously do not follow his policies very well.

You do realise the the Iraq war was caused because Saddam invaded Kuwait, then did not honor his cease-fire commitments. The course of "action" as you say, took 13 years before ending in the last option, war.

The UN even gave Saddam "one, final last chance" and Iraq didn't take it.

RedTop · « **Reply #27 on:** February 12, 2005, 04:15:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
So is GWB full of it or man of action? Is he going to live up his words?

How many of US citizens are willing to go to a war against NK ?
I think there's many in this board who are willing to join the army and help cleanse NK from their WMDs?

Nuke are you too old already? Yeager?

What difference should it make to you? Not like your gonna do anything anyway. Your just gonna sit there and play lil BBS arm chair General/Antagonist/Fortune Teller. I doubt you OR your country will lift a hand to do squat about anything anyway.

What's Finlands position on this General? You have any IDEAS or just big tough talk about how and what the BAD OLE U.S. needs to do.

Got any REAL constuctive things to say? Or , is it just more of your thinly veiled Nose snubbing.

Why don't you just sit back , relax , have another beer , and not worry about the U.S. and what we do. He!! our coat tails are getting crowded now. Not much room for you guys anyway.

And take Lada with you. Yall have a nice drink and talk about how the U.S. is so screwed up.

SaburoS · « **Reply #28 on:** February 12, 2005, 04:41:48 PM »

How about we open diplomatic relations and free trade instead?
Long term, that will be better for all. Remember, dictators live x amount of years. After he dies, it will be easier for that country to move towards a democratic type of govt once they realize that the USA isn't evil.
Remember, we feared China and the USSR far more than we do of NK, Iran, etc.

Nilsen · « **Reply #29 on:** February 12, 2005, 04:49:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by RedTop
What difference should it make to you? Not like your gonna do anything anyway. Your just gonna sit there and play lil BBS arm chair General/Antagonist/Fortune Teller. I doubt you OR your country will lift a hand to do squat about anything anyway.

What's Finlands position on this General? You have any IDEAS or just big tough talk about how and what the BAD OLE U.S. needs to do.

Got any REAL constuctive things to say? Or , is it just more of your thinly veiled Nose snubbing.

Why don't you just sit back , relax , have another beer , and not worry about the U.S. and what we do. He!! our coat tails are getting crowded now. Not much room for you guys anyway.

And take Lada with you. Yall have a nice drink and talk about how the U.S. is so screwed up.

I know we have been allies since.... forewer, but..

Why should the US be allowed to have nukes along with 4 others countires, and the rest can't? Are these 4 nations moraly superior or more stable than the rest?

Does any nation have a right to own nuke while the rest does not?