Author Topic: Yak Snapshot films  (Read 469 times)

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Yak Snapshot films
« on: November 16, 2000, 07:56:00 PM »
All the mumbo-jumbo I've tried using to explain this is confusing. So I snatched Lephturn and we made these:

Yak Snapshot films

There's four films total, showing a few different approach angles. One pass I blew completely, another I got too much speed and blacked out. Still, you can get the picture from these. This maneuver isn't a great one, since it relies on complete surprise to actually work. Place the gunsight a little high, towards the nose of the target, and you have a good chance of getting a Pilot Kill. I got Leph twice that way with only short bursts. Once from only the MGs, the second using an all-out blast from everything.

------------------------
Flakbait
Delta 6's Flight School
Whattaya mean I can't kill em? Why the hell not?!
 

Offline Andy Bush

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 153
      • http://www.simhq.com  (Contributing Editor - Air Combat Corner)
Yak Snapshot films
« Reply #1 on: November 17, 2000, 07:58:00 AM »
Nice film!

The lead angle for a snap shot can be pretty significant. Here's an idea of the problem.

 

The yellow circle represents the nominal lead required for a 90 degree snap shot. I assumed fighter speeds to be the same (250KTAS), and an average muzzle velocity of 2500 ft/sec. The range is ~1000'.

The red arrow represents what the lead would be if you were in-plane with the target...clearly well out of sight!

Sorry about the ball...!!

Andy

[This message has been edited by Andy Bush (edited 11-17-2000).]

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Yak Snapshot films
« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2000, 09:50:00 PM »
What ball?

------------------------
Flakbait
Delta 6's Flight School
Whattaya mean I can't kill em? Why the hell not?!
 

funked

  • Guest
Yak Snapshot films
« Reply #3 on: November 19, 2000, 02:44:00 AM »
The one that Andy should have been stepping on.