Author Topic: So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair  (Read 988 times)

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18758
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #30 on: February 20, 2005, 09:19:40 PM »
found it hilarious to see these richer than sin stuffy brits actually crying on the tele about this ban on their silly "traditional" "Sport"

Foxes 1, Stuffy brit snob 0

LOL
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #31 on: February 20, 2005, 10:34:34 PM »
Dredi, I actually do agree with you.


There's no sport with sitting with a high power rifle with a 10x scope in a tree stand being able to knock the fly out of it's wings at 300 yards...
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #32 on: February 21, 2005, 03:11:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Get a girdle beet1e.
:rofl:)

Quote
Originally posted by Stringer
Except it's hunters that contribute much more than most any other group when it comes to taking care of the natural habitat in which they hunt.

And you don't know very much about your average hunter.  Rednecks is definately NOT the term to describe your average hunter, especially when you consider the amount of money that goes into the gun, the equipment, the vehicle and into the dogs.  I'm referring to upland game hunters as that's the most hunting that I do.  It is not an inexpensive past-time.  But it is one that I'm passing onto my boys as my father did with me.
The Countryside Alliance here often points  to the positive impact that hunting has on the economy. Jobs are created managing the stables and managing the hounds, and there are jobs created in the business of supplying horse bridles and other riding gear.

As for the actions of the hunters ridding our countryside of the blight caused by foxes, I think that's largely BS: Foxes are bred in captivity to be released into the wild to be hunted.

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #33 on: February 21, 2005, 08:11:38 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Elfie
No.....that would be suicide imo :rofl


Naaaa The Indians used ta sometimes do it that way didnt they.

Hey then at least the animals would have a "sporting" chance.

Just remember. you dont "play dead" for black/brown bears.
they will eat you anyway LOL
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #34 on: February 21, 2005, 08:53:30 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Dredi, I actually do agree with you.


There's no sport with sitting with a high power rifle with a 10x scope in a tree stand being able to knock the fly out of it's wings at 300 yards...


Come with me to the Colorado mountains sometime and hunt elk. Spend a week climbing and feezing from before sunup until after dark and then tell me how easy it all is.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #35 on: February 21, 2005, 09:58:54 AM »
fat slobs... I am 55.... 6'1" and 190 lbs.  And... I am irresistable to women and certain types of men (not just brits).  

lazs

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #36 on: February 21, 2005, 10:01:55 AM »
oh... and the .50 caliber ban has to do with the fact that the round will penetrate the armor on bulletproof limo's

I don't have any friends that drive around in bulletproof limo's but the people who made the law do.  

I don't fear the people having .50's but the government does.

lazs

Offline beet1e

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7848
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #37 on: February 21, 2005, 10:24:20 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
fat slobs... I am 55.... 6'1" and 190 lbs.  And... I am irresistable to women and certain types of men (not just brits).
190lbs., but didn't you cheat earlier in life? :eek: I was ectomorphic until the family genes kicked in, about 30 years ago.

If lasersailor can't make it, I should go with toad to hunt elk. The location and the mountain climbing sound idyllic. And, believe it or not, I have shot and killed with a gun before. Got a hell of a bollocking for it though.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2005, 10:27:40 AM »
I expect a rush of red dressed brit with horses in France ... :D

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #39 on: February 21, 2005, 10:52:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Come with me to the Colorado mountains sometime and hunt elk. Spend a week climbing and feezing from before sunup until after dark and then tell me how easy it all is.


and tell me how that translates into a sport. Or in being sporting.

Hell I've done that hiking. Though not in Colorado.
Dont view hiking as a sport though either.

I support hunting and hunters.
but its not a sport. Its an activity.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2005, 10:57:35 AM by DREDIOCK »
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline DREDIOCK

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17775
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #40 on: February 21, 2005, 10:55:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
oh... and the .50 caliber ban has to do with the fact that the round will penetrate the armor on bulletproof limo's

I don't have any friends that drive around in bulletproof limo's but the people who made the law do.  

I don't fear the people having .50's but the government does.

lazs


Funny thing is the only people who might shoot at those cars with 50 Cal are the ones that dont care if there is a law or not and probably work for people who could and would easily obtain it elsewhere.
So for them the law is irrelevent
Death is no easy answer
For those who wish to know
Ask those who have been before you
What fate the future holds
It ain't pretty

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #41 on: February 21, 2005, 10:59:13 AM »
All in how you define "sport" I guess.

If you're looking for something with referees and rules, big crowds and player jerseys.... hunting isn't it.

I find it quite "sporting". But then I think the definition of "sport hunting" and "sport fishing" make sense when viewed against "subsistence hunting" and "subsistence fishing".

Does that help?

No?

Perhaps this then:

A sport consists of a normal physical activity or skill carried out under a publicly agreed set of rules, and with a recreational purpose: for competition, for self-enjoyment, to attain excellence, for the development of skill, or some combination of these.

Hunting is definitely a physical activity and requires varying amounts of skill, depending on how you pursue the activity. I suggest to you that taking a Rocky Mountain elk in his native habitat requires some skill as evidenced by the pretty standard success rate of less than 20%.

There are "publicly agreed rules"; generally, these are found in the game laws.

It's certainly recreational and leads to much self-enjoyment.


Sure fits the definition of a sport.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2005, 11:03:43 AM by Toad »
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline OneWordAnswer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 200
      • http://www.theanswerman.org/
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #42 on: February 21, 2005, 11:14:01 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
..but its not a sport. Its an activity.


confused

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #43 on: February 21, 2005, 11:17:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
and tell me how that translates into a sport. Or in being sporting.

Hell I've done that hiking. Though not in Colorado.
Dont view hiking as a sport though either.

I support hunting and hunters.
but its not a sport. Its an activity.


From the Mirriam-Webster Dictionary:

Main Entry: sport
Function: noun
1 a : a source of diversion : RECREATION b : sexual play c (1) : physical activity engaged in for pleasure (2) : a particular activity (as an athletic game) so engaged in
2 a : PLEASANTRY, JEST b : often mean-spirited jesting : MOCKERY, DERISION
3 a : something tossed or driven about in or as if in play b : LAUGHINGSTOCK
4 a : SPORTSMAN b : a person considered with respect to living up to the ideals of sportsmanship c : a companionable person
5 : an individual exhibiting a sudden deviation from type beyond the normal limits of individual variation usually as a result of mutation especially of somatic tissue
synonym see FUN

In terms of (1) above, hunting very definitely IS a sport.

Thank you.

Offline Shuckins

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3412
So much for your hunt ban, Mr Blair
« Reply #44 on: February 21, 2005, 11:36:44 AM »
I'm 5'9" and 185 pounds...huff puff...

Punching those keys was exhausting...I gotta rest now.




Bye the way...unless you're a vegetarian, shut the ell up about hunting.  If you eat meat bought at a market you're killing by proxy, which is no different, except it makes you feel "better" about yourself.

Besides, I defy you to prove that hunting is in any way "unnatural."  Please don't trot out that tired old argument that it is "cruel."   All of nature is cruel, and will continue to be so until time itself ends.  That is the way it has to be.  

Grafting human "morality" onto an indifferent, amoral system is naive and silly.  Humans and their ancestors have been a part of that system for millions of years.  We are instinctively tied to that system, and can only feel complete when we are part of that system.  Hunting brings all of my senses alive and makes the hair stand up on the back of my head.

You city-folk don't fully understand that, because you are no longer a part of the system.  Modern society divorces you from it.  Your idea of being a part of the natural system is building a 10,000 square foot "log home" 10 acres of cleared land on a hilltop to enjoy the "view" in a wilderness state such as Colorado, or Montana, or Wyoming.

Live your "civilized" life any way you want to, but leave me alone to enjoy a life-style that is older and richer in lore and culture than anything urbania can offer.