Author Topic: Bowling for Columbine on C4 at 11:05 tonight. (five star rating) (Read 1695 times)

Steve · « **Reply #30 on:** February 21, 2005, 04:58:36 PM »

Quote

Are you saying that they're all wrong?

Yes, because: The only people who consider his work documentary are left wing idiots and whackjobs.

Now, quit your trolling and go make dinner or something.

beet1e · « **Reply #31 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:03:04 PM »

Oh - so all film critics are left wing nutjobs?

I had dinner a couple of hours ago. But... look at the time - just coming up to 23:05 in Limeyland - maybe I'll watch BfC.

Thrawn · « **Reply #32 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:04:12 PM »

"You're only dangerous if you andyour ilk weild political power."

Yes, he might start a war of aggression that will lead to tens of thousands of dead people.

PS: I wish I had some ilk.

Steve · « **Reply #33 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:06:25 PM »

Quote

Oh - so all film critics are left wing nutjobs?

Just about, yes.

Martlet · « **Reply #34 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:07:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by beet1e
Oh - so all film critics are left wing nutjobs?

I had dinner a couple of hours ago. But... look at the time - just coming up to 23:05 in Limeyland - maybe I'll watch BfC.

Not all film critics rated it as a documentary or favorably. It's also been categorized as a comedy and a drama.

Halo · « **Reply #35 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:07:37 PM »

Michael Moore = exploitive biased crap.

Sandman · « **Reply #36 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:08:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by beet1e
Oh - so all film critics are left wing nutjobs?

It's bigger than that. Everyone in the film industry are left wing nutjobs.

Rather than Websters, I think I'll trust a filmaker's opinion on what constitutes a documentary film.

Quote

“As I am a documentary maker myself, I can tell you that already in the pre-production of a documentary, a message or argument is defined as an objective for the documentary. Usually this message will be chosen to reflect a point of view that is not commonly represented in the media picture, and aim the camera at aspects of a conflict few tend to consider. This way the documentary is meant to spark debate around the issues, and make its audience think deeper and become more reflected. It is because of the objective defined in pre-production documentaries are so different from news genres, which are supposed to not judge but merely report. Documentaries are not built to be this open allowing for individual conclusions, but rather to challenge narrow-mindedness among its audience so they will not merely follow the opinion of the general public. This way the documentary can challenge prejudices in a way news media can not.”

Steve · « **Reply #37 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:09:32 PM »

Quote

Yes, he might start a war of aggression that will lead to tens of thousands of dead people.

Who did? Bush? I mean if you ask the Iraqis, over 95% of them are glad the Americans stopped Hussein from continuing his muderous regime. I mean, if you are referring to Bush, you must feel that Hussein should still be in power? Is that what you mean?

Steve · « **Reply #38 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:10:21 PM »

Quote

I think I'll trust a filmaker's opinion on what constitutes a documentary film.

That's because like them, you are a a left wing extremist.

Sandman · « **Reply #39 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:10:47 PM »

95% eh?

Reference?

Sandman · « **Reply #40 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:12:04 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
That's because like them, you are a a left wing extremist.

I consider myself fairly moderate. I'm just to the left of you.

Steve · « **Reply #41 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:13:49 PM »

Quote

I consider myself fairly moderate

Well, like many left wing whackos, you lack the balls to admit you're a liberal. This continues to baffle me, but I stopped trying to understand liberals long ago. Ther is simply no way to use logic on them.

Nash · « **Reply #42 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:14:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Sandman
95% eh?

Reference?

Heh.... For someone so against propaganda, I would love to see where he got that number from.

Maybe he only appreciates state sanctioned propaganda? I find it rather dry, myself.

Steve · « **Reply #43 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:14:44 PM »

Quote

95% eh?

Do your own research. Or you can simply deny it in order to justify leaving Hussein and his murderous henchmen in power.

midnight Target · « **Reply #44 on:** February 21, 2005, 05:14:52 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Steve
Yes, because: The only people who consider his work documentary are left wing idiots and whackjobs.

And only rightwing idiots and wackjobs are soooo intent on defining it as something other than a documentary... you know why?

So it wouldn't win the Oscar for best Documentary.

Incredibly funny how the righty-tighties scorn the "hollyweirds" on one hand then try like heck to influence their vote with the other.

I challenge you or any of YOUR ILK to name a documentary that is not slanted or has completely factual content...

fire away punkin.