Author Topic: New Carry  (Read 512 times)

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
New Carry
« on: March 11, 2005, 07:13:18 AM »
I'm thinking about making a new purchase.  Something that can be carried once in while, and shot often.  I'm looking a a P239, but not even close to deciding.  Any suggestions?

Offline EN4CER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
New Carry
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2005, 07:20:46 AM »
What size - ammo  - price range etc? I carry my duty weapon when I'm off duty which is a Glock G19. I love it - its easy to maintain and for the past three years I shot perfect scores when I had to qualify at the range. I used to carry a Keltec P11 with Belt clip. It actually fit in my pants pocket comfortably but since I started carrying my duty weapon all the time I gave it to my wife.

Offline Martlet

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4390
New Carry
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2005, 07:28:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by EN4CER
What size - ammo  - price range etc? I carry my duty weapon when I'm off duty which is a Glock G19. I love it - its easy to maintain and for the past three years I shot perfect scores when I had to qualify at the range. I used to carry a Keltec P11 with Belt clip. It actually fit in my pants pocket comfortably but since I started carrying my duty weapon all the time I gave it to my wife.


Probably standard or compact.  I wouldn't want to go subcompact.  Since it's a firearm I intend to shoot a lot, probably 9mm.  .40 ammo is much more expensive.  I don't really have a price range.  In Massachusetts, you resign yourself to the fact that any firearm will cost you twice as much.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
New Carry
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2005, 08:21:01 AM »
I really like the Kimber .45 I bought.  I have a belt clip on it.

If you reload the .45 is the easiest to work with next to a 44 mag.

I also think that what worked in the past now works even better.... the revolver... the revolver in .357 to be specific.   don't just buy one.. buy two.

Get a Smith or torus in a 4" barrel and you will have a plinking fun gun supreme.   you can carry it fairly easy with "secret service" grips and despured..  If you need to carry a speedloader of the modern "injection" type or get the cylinder cut for full moon clips and load it faster than a semi auto... but... why would you need more than 6 shots?

then... buy a second .357..  the 340 pd smith.

A J frame made of titanim and scandium with shrouded hammer an 12 oz weight..  put it in your front pocket and no one will ever know you are carring a gun.  You won't even notice it either.

lazs

Offline EN4CER

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 598
New Carry
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2005, 08:32:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Martlet
In Massachusetts, you resign yourself to the fact that any firearm will cost you twice as much.


hehe - Ted Kennedy working hard for ya? Because I'm a big fan of Glock I would recommend the G26 - Its their 9mm Baby Glock but I would not call it subcompact. The slide is a little over 6 inches in length and it’s a little over 4 inches in height. It’s easy to maintain, great for a lot of range shooting, great for a carry, but its not a competition weapon and it has to be comfortable for you. What I mean by comfortable is it has a short grip which you personally may not like. I would say that of the guys that carry weapons off duty on my job (including the major gun buffs), almost half of them carry G26s.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
New Carry
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2005, 02:47:41 PM »
Nothing really wrong with a glock... you either love em or hate em.... I just can't form any kind of meaningful relationship with a plastic gun that is so ugly.   They are excellent weapons and some say that "pretty is as pretty does"   I would agree with that so far as women go but for me...

A large part of gun ownership is pride of ownership and feel.   for me... and me only.. I get nothing from the glock.   No solid feel... no history.... no appearance.   Shallow I know but..

I have allways been a shallow and insensitive person.

lazs

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
New Carry
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2005, 02:52:55 PM »
I have a Taurus Millenium, its nice, fairly small and compact, the one thing I do not like is the lack of hammer and the double action firing.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
New Carry
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2005, 03:02:55 PM »
I am with you on this one Laz, I know they are fine firearms, but Glocks just do not do anything for me. I would never buy one unless it was a  GREAT deal then it would be to sell it and make money lol.


For looks and feel for me nothing beats a 1911, plus all the history is there.


I love sigs though.


My fav of them all Is my M1.

Offline GreenCloud

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1365
New Carry
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2005, 03:52:09 PM »
wow..I just shot a HK tactical 45....

WOW...frikn cadilac..

 have an ruger 9m..i have hade for 8+ years....shhots liek crap compared to that 45.!!!! wow..again


anyways...I have a ruger 357. concelaed special..no hammer..and smooth corners..

I want to get a crimson trace for it..anyone use crimson yet?

btw..Im not a glock fan either.i didnt liek the weigth balance of it

soem of those 45.s out now shoot sooo dam nice

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
New Carry
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2005, 03:55:47 PM »
Speaking about Glock, have you guys seen the automatic versions? Those things are nasty.

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
New Carry
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2005, 04:35:20 PM »
Hey Martlet,

I started out with a Glock 17 then changed to a 19. It shot just as comfortably and was easier to carry off duty. I still have it and it's my primary carry gun now. I also bought the wife a Glock 26 as it would fit in a purse much better. It doesn't get fired nearly as much as it's harder to hit with it. I did try the smaller glock 40 but it's still in storage in my vault right now. I feel more comfortable with the larger 19 anyhow. With the right ammunition I feel as well or better armed than even a Kimber .45.

I really like the .45's and have several. I just prefer to carry and shoot the 9's.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline Dune

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
      • http://www.352ndfightergroup.com/
New Carry
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2005, 05:03:10 PM »
CZ 75 Compact.  The CZ 75 is the best double-action 9 there is.

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
New Carry
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2005, 09:17:20 AM »
dune.. I have a eaa witness (cz75 copy) in .45 and a 22 conversion for it... I have tried to like this gun but.... I just don't... it is not solid feeling or accurate in my opinion... I shot real cz's thinking they would be better but I didn't like em either.

mav... people who live with the glock all seem to get fond of em.   I just can't.   I like the feel of my $125 makarov better.  I am not picky tho and feel well armed with about anything from my 32 ppk on up to my 44 mags.   All I want is safe and reliable with good accuracy at 3 feet for a defense gun.  

I like to plink with em tho and such and for that... I like revolvers first and accurate 1911's second..  The Kimber is really a bargin at 1200 bucks everything considered... but so is the makarov and so are the revolvers I own.

green... I just shot a ruger in 45acp... what a horrible gun.  It was hard to not say bad things to the owner.  I just let him shoot the Kimber instead.   How can Ruger make such great revolvers and such horrible (looks, feel finish, accuracy) clunkly semi autos?

lazs

Offline indy007

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3294
New Carry
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2005, 11:03:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
green... I just shot a ruger in 45acp... what a horrible gun.  It was hard to not say bad things to the owner.  I just let him shoot the Kimber instead.   How can Ruger make such great revolvers and such horrible (looks, feel finish, accuracy) clunkly semi autos?

lazs


that's kinda funny to me laz. i went out & shot a friend's glock .45, h&k usp .45, & ruger .45 on the same weekend. Most of it has to do with my lack of prettythang, but only the ruger was heavy enough to absorb most of the recoil for me, and the bigger size of it felt good. Didn't feel as good as the USP, but better than the glock. I shot my tightest groups with the ruger, slightly larger with the USP, and even bigger with the glock. I didn't pay close attention to the finish though, just how it felt & how many little holes I put in those dangerous looking pieces of paper.

Offline GrimCO

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 721
      • http://www.GrimsReapers.com
New Carry
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2005, 11:33:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Nothing really wrong with a glock... you either love em or hate em.... I just can't form any kind of meaningful relationship with a plastic gun that is so ugly.   They are excellent weapons and some say that "pretty is as pretty does"   I would agree with that so far as women go but for me...

A large part of gun ownership is pride of ownership and feel.   for me... and me only.. I get nothing from the glock.   No solid feel... no history.... no appearance.   Shallow I know but..

I have allways been a shallow and insensitive person.

lazs


Carried my Glock 22 for 5 out of 7 years on the police force. It shot straight, never jammed on me, fired even when dirty.

I hated the damned thing. Can't explain it, just never liked it. It just didn't "feel right" in my hand.