Author Topic: F4U question  (Read 1686 times)

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
F4U question
« Reply #15 on: March 15, 2005, 04:03:06 AM »
Well not that it matters much, but all U.S. engines suffered damage and could/would seize up after 7 to 30 seconds of inverted flight.

storch

  • Guest
F4U question
« Reply #16 on: March 15, 2005, 05:25:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
Well not that it matters much, but all U.S. engines suffered damage and could/would seize up after 7 to 30 seconds of inverted flight.


never read that anywhere

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
F4U question
« Reply #17 on: March 15, 2005, 09:20:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
Well not that it matters much, but all U.S. engines suffered damage and could/would seize up after 7 to 30 seconds of inverted flight.


Incorrect statement
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.

Offline Golfer

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6314
F4U question
« Reply #18 on: March 15, 2005, 10:50:38 AM »
Quote
Incorrect statement


Let's not tell him why or anything.

Take away the "All US Fighter" part and it's not that incorrect...in fact it is correct if the engine wasn't designed with or had installed an inverted fuel and oil system.

Offline ATA

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 555
F4U question
« Reply #19 on: March 15, 2005, 11:51:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Golfer
Let's not tell him why or anything.

Take away the "All US Fighter" part and it's not that incorrect...in fact it is correct if the engine wasn't designed with or had installed an inverted fuel and oil system.

No way,whatever is American supost. to be  good.
Nobody ever mentions that P47 is russian couse it's good:)it's an American:)
if it were crapy they would call it "russian pos"
Same goes to P51 i think it's german creation,not sure.
No offence to anyone

Offline Sikboy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6702
F4U question
« Reply #20 on: March 15, 2005, 12:07:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ATA
No way,whatever is American supost. to be  good.
Nobody ever mentions that P47 is russian couse it's good:)it's an American:)
if it were crapy they would call it "russian pos"
Same goes to P51 i think it's german creation,not sure.
No offence to anyone


I don't get it. Considering how good the Soviet Planes are in this game, where is this coming from?

Is this more about the lgay-7 thing? Sorry ATA, but it wouldn't have that nickname if it wasn't so good at what it does. Sort of like the P-51 "Runstang."

-Sik
You: Blah Blah Blah
Me: Meh, whatever.

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
F4U question
« Reply #21 on: March 15, 2005, 12:20:14 PM »
If a plane wasn't good, it sure wouldn't be added in Aces High.

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
F4U question
« Reply #22 on: March 15, 2005, 01:07:39 PM »
Ok, which American planes had an oil system capable of sustaining oil pressure in inverted flight?

Heres the planes that could not do it:

P-47
F4U
F6F
P-38
P-51

Any by logical deduction, if these planes were not equipped with such an oil system, neither were other American fighters.

Offline Muddie

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 136
F4U question
« Reply #23 on: March 15, 2005, 04:21:34 PM »
You don't by any chance have a reference that back this claim up?




Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
Ok, which American planes had an oil system capable of sustaining oil pressure in inverted flight?

Heres the planes that could not do it:

P-47
F4U
F6F
P-38
P-51

Any by logical deduction, if these planes were not equipped with such an oil system, neither were other American fighters.

Offline ATA

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 555
F4U question
« Reply #24 on: March 15, 2005, 04:55:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sikboy
I don't get it. Considering how good the Soviet Planes are in this game, where is this coming from?

Is this more about the lgay-7 thing? Sorry ATA, but it wouldn't have that nickname if it wasn't so good at what it does. Sort of like the P-51 "Runstang."

-Sik

No i wasn't talking about lgay7 thing
My apologies guys.I didn't mean to offend you.
BTW acodrding to that nikname P51 runs and la7 is homo that runs.:)?
People that cant fight will run,doesnt matter wich plane they are in and same skill level pilots will try to cach you till you run out fuel.
But it's just mine humble opinion.
Almost forgot,Kozhedub flew La5,last 17 kils in la7,it doesnt deserve that homo nik:)
Best regards:aok
« Last Edit: March 15, 2005, 04:58:17 PM by ATA »

Offline SunTracker

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
F4U question
« Reply #25 on: March 15, 2005, 05:36:48 PM »
P-51
http://nasaui.ited.uidaho.edu/nasaspark/safety/process/flight.htm
Quote
Flight restrictions are: no "power-on" spins; no snap rolls; inverted flying should not exceed 10 seconds (there will be a loss of oil pressure and failure of the scavenge pumps to function properly in inverted position)


P-38
http://home.tiscali.dk/winthrop/p38op1.html
Quote
1. FLIGHT RESTRICTIONS

(1) Deleted.

(2) Continuous.inverted flight.



The F3F had a scavanger pump to allow for sustained inverted flight, but the F6F, F4U, and P47 did not.

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
F4U question
« Reply #26 on: March 15, 2005, 11:04:09 PM »
So its not the engine themselfs, but the pumps that dictate if the engine can or cannot be supplyed the oil to fly inverted, interesting.

Simple, nuff said.
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline bunch

  • Parolee
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 636
      • http://hitechcreations.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?&forumid=17
F4U question
« Reply #27 on: March 16, 2005, 03:15:59 AM »
Since when does an R-2800 engine require oil to operate properly?

Offline Muddie

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 136
F4U question
« Reply #28 on: March 16, 2005, 09:23:20 AM »
This is good stuff!!

   Muchos Gracias Senor!



Quote
Originally posted by SunTracker
P-51
http://nasaui.ited.uidaho.edu/nasaspark/safety/process/flight.htm
 

P-38
http://home.tiscali.dk/winthrop/p38op1.html
 

The F3F had a scavanger pump to allow for sustained inverted flight, but the F6F, F4U, and P47 did not.

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
F4U question
« Reply #29 on: March 16, 2005, 09:45:39 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Golfer
Let's not tell him why or anything.

Take away the "All US Fighter" part and it's not that incorrect...in fact it is correct if the engine wasn't designed with or had installed an inverted fuel and oil system.


Incorrect statement.

Oh, and you are on ignore, I do not listen to people that support liars...  they are just as bad as the liar.
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.