Originally posted by FiLtH Hehehe is that real? Wow if it is.But...this part " Sometimes jurors should be held accountable for their mistakes." Thats just plain scary.
Originally posted by Habu You guys all seem so smart.How can a guy go outside a restaurant and shoot someone, run inside after and...No murder weapon is every found. Do you not think that every rooftop, garbage, catch basin etc for 5 blocks around was not searched and searched again after the police arrived?The murder weapon was recovered in a dumpster nearby, but could not be tied to BLAKE Did they find gunpowder on his cloths and hands? How do you shoot someone so close range and not get totally covered in gun powder residue.HE did test positive for GSR, but the defese argued that he was in possession of a a firearm and that he touched his wife after she was shot so there could have been a transfer of GSR to his hands No witnesses.He may have hired someone to kill her but he did not pull the trigger and did not act alone.The jury did not find the testamony of the two stuntmen that allege BLAKE hired them to kill his wife The jury did what it could but without a gun how can you say he did it? What he ate the thing afterwards?The police never found the other person who either acted alone and killed her for his own reasons or did it for Blake. Either way there was no evidence to directly prove Blake did it.
Originally posted by FiLtH Hehehe is that real?
