Author Topic: Name This...(1044)  (Read 371 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(1044)
« on: March 29, 2005, 12:17:29 AM »
???











Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2005, 12:31:45 AM »
LOL, went to that website earlier today looking for info on the Battleship in the photo.

The USS West Virginia, in floating drydock after scraping bottom near Leyte, if memory serves.


I love the look of those clipper bow battleships like the West Virginia, Tennessee, California, Maryland, Colorado, New Mexico etc

Dan/CorkyJr
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2005, 07:23:28 AM »
"In floating drydock ABSD-1, off Aessi Island, Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides, on 13 November 1944. "


 IMO that this was possible is yet another solid example of why the Axis never could have won the war.

 Could any of the Axis powers had a dry dock that size thousands of miles from home to perform maintenance on a capitol ship of that size?
« Last Edit: March 29, 2005, 08:13:18 PM by Westy »

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2005, 02:57:53 PM »
ABSD-1, it is:)

USS West Virginia, it is:)

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2005, 03:41:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Westy
"In floating drydock ABSD-1, off Aessi Island, Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides, on 13 November 1944. "


 IMO that this was possible is yet another solid example of why the Axis never could have won the war.

 Could any of the Axis powers had a dry dock, thousands that size of miles away from home, to perform maintenance on a capitol ship of that size?


An excellent point.  When you talk about the German surface navy, for example, every sortie has been recorded as an event, even of supply ships, raiders, etc.  That's because the sum total of activity was very small.  And the Germans had almost NO support structure in place to maintain, fuel, or protect their forces at sea.  And therefore German warships had a short, exciting career.

The Japanese were somewhat better off, but still had nothing like the structure needed in place on day 1 of the war, much less later.  They got into the naval war long before they had the infrastructure to support it.

A big part of the reasoning behind the "hit 'em where they ain't" plan used by Nimitz was to skip around (and isolate) those few Japanese bases that were built up to support their fleet, thus making Jap fleet operations nearly impossible.  By isolating Truk early, the Japanese fleet was forced back on their home bases.  They had as long a commute to get to the fight as US forces did, but didn't have a mobile support force to enable them to sustain any kind of operations.  The USN did, and that support force is what really won the war, if you look at it from a strategic standpoint.

Offline Pongo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6701
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2005, 05:36:18 PM »
There is no question that ww2 wasnt fair.
Read "Brute Force" by John Ellis.

Offline Pei

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1903
Name This...(1044)
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2005, 06:39:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Pongo
There is no question that ww2 wasnt fair.
Read "Brute Force" by John Ellis.


"All is fair in Love and War"