Originally posted by Holden McGroin
"...and would buy years of transition to a hydrogen economy without being addicted to outside sources of oil, and all the political and economic problems associated with that. "
The US is "addicted" to outside sources of financing and manufacturing, among other things. Why would energy be any different?
Sounds like there are two issues here when talking about not wanting to be addicted to outside oil. First is the rising cost (which is probably the main impetus for this discussion and will only get more play when the summer hits), and having to suckle at the tit of a bunch of terrorist fundamentalist nutjobs. Call that resentment for not being able to bite the hand that feeds you.
Whatever it is... It's not going to change any time soon.
Two things are driving up the cost. The market and the Chinese. I don't know what it's like in other places, but here people are falling all over themselves trying to figure out better ways to get more and more oil to China 'cuz damn.... It's like they all of a sudden just woke up and are REALLY hungry.
I'm not a tech type guy, but my instinct tells me that when it comes to energy, it's a different thing than, say, pharmaceuticals. Those folks don't even know what's going to be possible. With energy, I think we've already mapped the entire genome, as it were, and are going to have to play the hand that was dealt us. At least for a good long while.
The only change we're probably ever going to see in our lifetime is going to be from within. Which means ponying up at the pump, or changing our lifestyles and expectations and getting by using less (in addiction parlance this is known as "chipping").
Hey... whaddyagonnado?