Author Topic: Norvegian tragedie  (Read 609 times)

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2005, 09:58:12 AM »
It was doomed, why you ask?

Not design flaws. Not bad flying...


Gay music.


I was praying for the damn thing to crash to wake me out of the gay music induced stupor.

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2005, 10:02:50 AM »
No Habu I'm saying that an RC should never have been designed so fragile that it couldn't take the standard joyride RC's are commonly subjected to.

Which is why I said:

Quote
if it was so fragile it had to be flown like a commercial airliner to stay intact.


In essence: Commercial airliners are not built for aerobatics nor they should. Rc's however are different.
« Last Edit: April 08, 2005, 10:08:58 AM by Siaf__csf »

Offline 101ABN

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 728
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2005, 10:20:41 AM »
well, back to the drawing board.   ;)

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #18 on: April 08, 2005, 10:50:54 AM »
Gscholz I assume the guy who flew the plane also designed it. Obviously it didn't fulfill the purpose he intended it for as it broke down while he flew it.

Define 'within reason' cuz a beetle that's designed for top 100mph going at 200mph doesn't seem within reason to me.

Cars that are designed for those speeds have different suspension, aerodynamics, brakes etc. for the sole reason of driving those speeds controllably.

Offline bob149

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 119
      • http://n/a
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #19 on: April 08, 2005, 11:08:28 AM »
eeerm my old 72 1200cc beetle would do 78mph...on the flat , my 66 1300 would go a tad faster ....

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #20 on: April 08, 2005, 11:08:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by GScholz
A regular turn? Did you even see the movie? He made a high speed loop you dolt!

By your standards every single airplane ever built are flawed designs since you can easily overstress them all.

If you take a VW Beetle and put a big engine in it and go flying off the road at 200 kph ... is it then the engine's fault? Of course not, it's YOUR fault.


Who was talking about beetles and 200mph again?

If you run out of arguments, save your personal insults and move on.

Btw I believe my mercedes is quite safe to drive with its designed top speed (250km/h) on autobahn.

Offline deSelys

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2512
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #21 on: April 08, 2005, 11:10:02 AM »
This thread is getting more painful to read than the original vid to watch...
Current ID: Romanov

It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then it's just a game to find the eye

'I AM DID NOTHING WRONG' - Famous last forum words by legoman

Offline Otto

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1566
      • http://www.cris.com/~ziggy2/
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #22 on: April 08, 2005, 11:25:05 AM »
AaaaaH!  Way too much  wrong that day....:(

Offline Siaf__csf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2213
Norvegian tragedie
« Reply #23 on: April 08, 2005, 11:54:27 AM »
Gsholz the difference is other has a proper design to fulfill the task and the other does not which means the others design is flawed for the purpose IF the purpose is to fly loops or drive 200mph.

Quote
You should know the limitations of the design and keep within them. An RC sailplane is not designed to pull so many G's.


Exactly and that's why he should never have built the thing with a jet engine in the first place. The design of a glider is not suitable for a heavy jet engine and high speed flying.

That contraption would have broken to pieces from a strong gush of wind just as likely it did while looping it.