Originally posted by Nash
Okay, in your world you never pronounced him guilty (as if that means anything), you basically only said that he seems guilty. A not so subtle distinction not so lost on me.
And Nuke - you are the one going batchit about all this other stuff (sanctions/Iraq state of affairs). I can point out how repeatedly in this thread you will not let these things drop; can you do the same for mine?
He was there to talk about the Oil/Food scandle. He addressed those issues. You overlook them and fixatedly talk about this other stuff, then say I'm the one doing it? I don't think so buddy.
Wrong again. I didn't say he seemed guilty either. I said it seems like they might have evidence, because they claim in the report that they do.
Nash, your post with the video was what I was refering to when I said
Thanks for posting that link Nash. After viewing that, I can rest assured that he is an idiot regarding the matter of UN sanctions and the state of Iraq.
Again, I'll say the guy is an idiot on those matters. He explained how the US senate ( not the UN) was responsible for millions of deaths, mostly children.
Yeah, right. Saddam had nothing to do with any of it. I hate people with his attitude.
As far as the hearing, I'm willing to wait for it to all pan out. You want to jump up and down with glee like the guy just "schooled" the Senate, go right ahead.
