Agreed.
While I personally think this is a biological issue, I respect that others have opinions that differ. The only time I really get distressed about things like this is when I feel that the person I'm disagreeing with chooses to disagree not on the merits of the evidence, but instead because they've already made up their minds.
If someone posts "This research is flawed because" (so far, I'm cool, I'm listening, but then they continue with) " scientists occasionally make mistakes, and it's obvious that, because I disagree with their assertion, they must logically be mistaken." That's frustrating, because it's like the person isn't playing with the same rules the rest of us are.
I think the research is interesting, and I look forward to reading some scientific research that suggests otherwise. While I have an opinion on how this works, I don't think either side has made a slam-dunk case yet.
Whichever way the science goes, I'll follow, but I won't let dogma take over for the critical center of my brain.