Ownership is a powerful motivater.
Remember when we got kill message when we killed someone. ("Killjoy shot down xxxx") Now thats owned.
If we gave ownership of the base to the squad that captures it we unlease some powerful social forces.
Yes, I think there would be disagreements and one squad sneaking a capture. I also think this is healthy. It fosters co-operation or not. If not, then that is an advantage for your enemy isn't it.
Yes, I think it will aggregate bigger squads. This is called organization. Is there room for smaller squads? Yes. It's not the nature of the AH cutlure to allow a dictatorship or even oligarchy. But I just like seeing the word oligarchy.
What will happen when two or more squads are taking a base? I don't know. Thats the social engineering part.
Is there room for the furballers? Why not? I don't see anything changing. If the squads take one base, there's always the next to furball at.
The rules are simple:
1) If a squad member captures a base the base is renamed for that squad (A6 becomes A6-FZ).
2) If your not a member of a squad, there is no name change.
I'll say it again, "Ownership is a powerful motivator."
