Author Topic: Name This...(1071)  (Read 447 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(1071)
« on: June 07, 2005, 12:20:06 PM »
???












Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2005, 12:26:02 PM »
Junkers 290?
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline StarOfAfrica2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5162
      • http://www.vf-17.org
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #2 on: June 07, 2005, 01:04:56 PM »
I have to agree, looks like a Ju 290 (altho the pic I have the tail is a tad different).

Offline Mister Fork

  • AvA Staff Member
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7294
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #3 on: June 07, 2005, 01:26:34 PM »
Looks like she's in trouble too (note water splashes around her)... :(
"Games are meant to be fun and fair but fighting a war is neither." - HiTech

Offline Pappy35

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2005, 03:29:09 PM »
Junkers Ju290-A3?

That aircraft just close almost looke like Ju390, the 6 engined development of the Ju290 with long span and overall length, but I don't believe Ju390 ever saw action while Ju390 first test flown in 1943 and the producation was cancel while they needed more fighters.

My wild guess is Ju290-A3.

Pappy

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2005, 10:35:18 PM »
Junkers JU 290, it is :)

.............


 Pictured off Corscia, being shot down by B-26's acording to image source.

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
Name This...(1071)
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2005, 09:45:12 AM »
Errrr....

It is, JU-90.


.................

 I made a Mistake in identifying this as a JU-290, I actualy even looked it up at first to make shure, but as pointed out to me by a fellow on another forum it is unmistakabaly a JU-90.