Author Topic: Amazing i dont see AH Lawsuit? (Read 1052 times)

Furball · « **Reply #15 on:** May 18, 2005, 02:54:30 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by hitech
It has been settled, as to how, I can not comment.

HiTech

you threatened him with dog doo on a stick?

Airhead · « **Reply #16 on:** May 18, 2005, 02:55:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by hitech
It has been settled, as to how, I can not comment.

HiTech

Aw c'mon, HiTech- you can tell us. Did you settle it with guns, knives or hatchets?

Nilsen · « **Reply #17 on:** May 18, 2005, 02:56:34 PM »

But were you able to remove things from your bribe list, or did you have to add stuff

Not my business, but this is like Oprah only LIVE!

GreenCloud · « **Reply #18 on:** May 18, 2005, 02:57:25 PM »

jesus..I thought somebody Hijakced my user name....and wahst funny..kind of..Is BiGB got banned form the Oclub..

and as mighty HT said..and we read this before awhiel ago...it was settled

funny to see a name i cnat use in here any more,,lol ; (

Furball · « **Reply #19 on:** May 18, 2005, 02:58:09 PM »

maybe his avatar should now read

"I
COAD
FOR
DOH"

CPorky · « **Reply #20 on:** May 18, 2005, 03:17:02 PM »

If you are ever owed something, money, services, and someone has become indigent do not accept a last minue payment. It constitutes acceptence and makes any litigation against them much more difficult in the future.

I'm betting they knew this and tried to throw some scraps at Dale.

Quote

Originally posted by LePaul
I'm no lawyer but I find # 3 more than a bit intriguing.

JB73 · « **Reply #21 on:** May 18, 2005, 03:20:51 PM »

seeing as how HTC is still in business, not hiking up the charges for a subscription, doing more aggressive marketing, and offering a cash prize, i would say the lawsuit went at least ok for them....

i doubt they lost in any significant way

Staga · « **Reply #22 on:** May 18, 2005, 04:03:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Chairboy
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?u=/netahtml/srchnum.htm&Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&r=1&l=50&f=G&d=PALL&s1=6042477.WKU.&OS=PN/6042477&RS=PN/6042477

So is this the beef in this case and if yes then it looks like the inventor is some guy named Dale Addink and not iEn?
Is inventor and owner of the patent same in US or is owner mentioned in some other document?

Pei · « **Reply #23 on:** May 18, 2005, 07:10:17 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Staga
So is this the beef in this case and if yes then it looks like the inventor is some guy named Dale Addink and not iEn?
Is inventor and owner of the patent same in US or is owner mentioned in some other document?

The onwer (assignee) is different from the inventor(s). The inventor has to be an individual but the assignee is usually the company the individual works for.

doc1kelley · « **Reply #24 on:** May 20, 2005, 11:33:21 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Airhead
Aw c'mon, HiTech- you can tell us. Did you settle it with guns, knives or hatchets?

Actually No, he cannot tell us if a settlement was reached if a "non-disclosure clause was included". Which are almost always in the settlement and prohibits either party of the action to disclose the details. It's one of those things where one gets to say that he didn't loose and the other doesn't get the pleasure of saying that they won. At the total cost of litigation these days, both can probably feel that they won and are probably correct in their feelings as the only one that really wins in an action such as this is the trial attorneys.

All the Best...
Jay
awDOC1

Terror · « **Reply #25 on:** May 20, 2005, 11:40:58 AM »

Well, at least tell us the status of the Patent. Who owns it and who is licensing it? Who do I contact when I code my first Perl Coded Awesomest Game that everyone wants and I need to use this technology?

Terror