Author Topic: Good Times!  (Read 1051 times)

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Good Times!
« on: June 09, 2005, 07:00:23 PM »
Once again I must put my vote in for fun new vehicles and equipment that I believe should be implemented into AH.

First of couse, The Wirbelwind............Yes!


Second on the list, you guessed it......better airfield protection


We have the Panzer & Tiger and the T34. How bout the Sherman Firefly for US

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Good Times!
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2005, 07:19:49 PM »
Then I advocate....



or a ZSU-23 b/c it had better performance in the field.





For those pesky NOE buffs

And if the whining continues disembark troops from M3's with MANPADS - that'll make life difficult!

Wolf


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Good Times!
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2005, 07:23:33 PM »
Just a wee bit after WWII I think;)

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
Good Times!
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2005, 08:56:43 PM »
Well you could substitute the Shilka with the ZU-23 which is hand operated but the same gun package minus 2 cannons. That was end of WW2 / Korea era.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Good Times!
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2005, 09:14:11 PM »
Sherman Firefly V C would be for the Brits, not US and due to the penetration on the 17lber would need to be perked somewhat, lest Tiger Is cease to be really viable.

The Wirbelwind would be fine.  If it was too viscious it could always be lightly perked later, like the F4U-1C.

I'm not sure the 88 would be needed along with the Wirbelwind and Ostwind.


A M4A3 Sherman with either the 75mm or 76mm gun would be a great addition too.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Good Times!
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2005, 11:56:02 PM »
karnak:
"I'm not sure the 88 would be needed along with the Wirbelwind and Ostwind"

That's not an "88"  it's a Bofors 40mm  Anti-Aircraft gun

The rest of your statements are dead on tho:D

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Good Times!
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2005, 02:07:37 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MOIL
I]That's not an "88"  it's a Bofors 40mm  Anti-Aircraft gun

Ah.  Then what does it offer over the Ostwind? 3mm isn't going to make much differences, especially when the Ostwind is almost always a one hit, one kill tool.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Good Times!
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2005, 02:12:30 AM »
The round must be more powerful.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline MOIL

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1639
      • http://www.ltar.org
Good Times!
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2005, 07:56:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Ah.  Then what does it offer over the Ostwind? 3mm isn't going to make much differences, especially when the Ostwind is almost always a one hit, one kill tool.

Reach my friend, reach! The 40mm Bofors round has more reach than that of the Eastwind. One of the reasons why the carrier groups favored the 40mm over any other gun platform for AA defense. The quad & twin mount setups were devastating against the Kamikaze's of WWII

37x263B{ FlaK 18/36/37/42}             40x311R{L60} & 40x364R{L70}=Bofors