Author Topic: B-52 (Read 1845 times)

Furball · « **Reply #30 on:** June 14, 2005, 01:23:36 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by SuperDud
No nookies GHEEEEEEEEEEEEEESH!

you are my slave now, you will be 'receiving' plenty of nookie!

DaYooper · « **Reply #31 on:** June 14, 2005, 01:31:08 PM »

Just remember, the samurai sword killed more people in WWII than did the atom bomb.

Maybe pilots ejecting from Nip planes should get a sword instead of a .45.

SuperDud · « **Reply #32 on:** June 14, 2005, 01:38:50 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Furball
you are my slave now, you will be 'receiving' plenty of nookie!

YEAH!#@##!# nookie!####!

OH...WAIT A MIN!!!!

Furball · « **Reply #33 on:** June 14, 2005, 01:55:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DaYooper
Just remember, the samurai sword killed more people in WWII than did the atom bomb.

Maybe pilots ejecting from Nip planes should get a sword instead of a .45.

most of them defenceless POW's.

Karnak · « **Reply #34 on:** June 14, 2005, 02:19:06 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by DaYooper
Just remember, the samurai sword killed more people in WWII than did the atom bomb.

Maybe pilots ejecting from Nip planes should get a sword instead of a .45.

I highly, highly doubt this to be remotely true. Swords are just too ineficient.

Pooh21 · « **Reply #35 on:** June 14, 2005, 02:40:20 PM »

mm comfort girls

I want acomfort girl

BUG_EAF322 · « **Reply #36 on:** June 14, 2005, 02:41:30 PM »

I seen pics of early green B29's

and those skins dont look like prototypes either. I guess the makers wanted it to be historical correct.

Unless they flew sorties with prototypes.

frank3 · « **Reply #37 on:** June 14, 2005, 04:42:26 PM »

I always thought the B-29 was a little....post-war...but that's just me

I highly doubt we'll get the B-29, hard to modell the remote controlled gun-turret, not to mention the n00k itself.

That and we already have enough allied heavies.
(makes you think what side we're on

)

Aubrey · « **Reply #38 on:** June 14, 2005, 05:24:04 PM »

I saw a documentry on the B-25 . I seem to remmeber that they were very difficult for new pilots to fly. Is this correct?

nirvana · « **Reply #39 on:** June 14, 2005, 05:49:29 PM »

B26s were relatively hard for the newer pilots to fly if I recall correctly, something control surfaces maybe or maybe was engines? Anyways the second model that came out was easier to fly I think. That's going from memory correct it as much as you like.

Raptor · « **Reply #40 on:** June 14, 2005, 05:49:29 PM »

the B29s that carried a-bombs had to be modified, and I dont think HTC is going to model a modified plane. Therefore, no A-Bombs.

on the other hand... those fire bombs would be good town/factory levelers;)

Raptor · « **Reply #41 on:** June 14, 2005, 05:51:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by nirvana
B26s were relatively hard for the newer pilots to fly if I recall correctly, something control surfaces maybe or maybe was engines? Anyways the second model that came out was easier to fly I think. That's going from memory correct it as much as you like.

The second model had larger wingspan and a larger vertical stab

J_A_B · « **Reply #42 on:** June 14, 2005, 06:00:29 PM »

A small number of early production Boeing-built B-29's were painted olive drab. The vast majority of them were bare metal.

J_A_B

gear · « **Reply #43 on:** June 14, 2005, 06:45:04 PM »

Yea nuke'm but ya gotta give the axsis the V2 and the V1.But emmber that there was only "2" atomic bombs,there for the perk cost would be very,very very high.

SuperDud · « **Reply #44 on:** June 14, 2005, 08:01:41 PM »

I WANT NOOKIES!