Originally posted by eskimo2
You have to go back 20 years to find a 600 acre fire?
In Alaska alone last year 5,000,000 acres burned. Alaska did not dominate the US fire stories last year either.
Like I said, no comparison.
eskimo
At least I didn't have to go back to the days of the Heinkel-111 for my example!

No comparison between Alaska and Britain. Alaska is 570,000+ square miles, Britain is less than 95,000. Yet Britain's population is around 58m, so the population density here is about 1000 times as high, with the potential for many more fireworks per square mile to be let off!
How much of the 5m acres that got burned in Alaska was caused by fireworks? Not too much is my guess, as the population of Alaska is only about 550,000. And that's probably why there are NO fireworks restrictions in Alaska, according to the website linked by Mr. Toad.
One of the factors with regard to those fires that get out of control is the ability of the fire services to get to them. Britain is quite small, so there aren't any really remote areas, which means that the fire services can get to fires quickly, before they get out of control. There's likely to be a ready supply of water nearby. But in remote areas of the US like the Cascades, I don't suppose there are any fire hydrants, some areas are inaccessible by road, and the fire services might have to travel many miles to get there.