Is it possible, at the time being, looking only for culprits of 11th. Sept acts?
Will it be at the future?
If it is, will it be possible to take effective actions against them?
If they are, will we have the guts to execute them?
If we have, will be these actions accepted by radical muslims without their ouwn retaliation?
I think there is no doubt we are in WWIII since '70ies against terrorists. In their early stage, an undeclared, and instrumentalized in the cold war context one. Lately, declared on their side, unaccepted by western countries. From 11th, declared on both sides, but yet with extremely blur geografical references.
The real problem, the only one (from my point of view) is if this war can be limited to terrorists themselves. Their tactic is crystal clear: they are using first poor people's rage against US and blind faith to have cheap ammo against western countries. Second stage, they will attempt to unite muslims in general, and Arab countries in particular, against western countries. Heroism and military skills will be the facade, anger against retaliation over Afghan brothers will be the hook.
At this point, I think we should think: Is it really worth Afghan retaliation? Woudn't it be better to look for financial roots, and strike & retaliate there? I mean, let's put it bluntly, and only as a hypothetical situation: Suppose Irak (you could use any other country) is found supporting terrorists. What would you do? Blast Afghanistan, which has no target of military relevance, or take over Irak?. The risk of setting Middle East on flames is exactly the same, I think. The reward for military action bears little comparison. The warning given to cooperating countries will be loud and clear.
I think Afghan retaliation is something that has to be done. Especially after they declared Jihad on US and allies. But, does this have to be the first movement? Is it wise to strike there first?
Cheers,
Pepe