« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Better ditching and object collision modelling  (Read 2547 times)

Offline mora

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2351
Better ditching and object collision modelling
« on: August 12, 2005, 11:16:37 AM »
It was better the way it were. Of course it wasn't realistic to survive 400 mph ditches, but now it's impossible to survive above a certain speed which is also unrealistic. Also there shouldn't be an instant death when hitting a tree or any other object.
Logged

Offline slayer1

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #1 on: June 19, 2010, 10:20:28 PM »
i agree +1  :aok

~slayer~
Logged
bluey the aussie red head!!

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2010, 11:00:25 PM »
So a WWII era plane going 98mph that hits a tree................

What is the probability that the pilot survives?

Logged
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline bravoa8

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1571
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #3 on: June 19, 2010, 11:09:19 PM »
I sense.... Flame war
Logged

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #4 on: June 19, 2010, 11:38:49 PM »
Quote from: mora on August 12, 2005, 11:16:37 AM
It was better the way it were. Of course it wasn't realistic to survive 400 mph ditches, but now it's impossible to survive above a certain speed which is also unrealistic. Also there shouldn't be an instant death when hitting a tree or any other object.
I have to wonder when was the last plane crash you survived at 150mph or faster. Ever hit a tree at 60mph? Imagine hitting that tree at 200mph. It's more realistic than you think.
Logged
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2010, 12:29:43 AM »
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #6 on: June 20, 2010, 09:03:46 AM »
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.


Semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #7 on: June 20, 2010, 09:10:33 AM »
Quote from: guncrasher on June 20, 2010, 09:03:46 AM
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.


Semp

And you know their going that fast how?

Got film?


wrongway
Logged
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18279
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2010, 09:11:14 AM »
The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !







....oh and IN   :neener:
Logged

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2010, 10:33:17 AM »
DOH!!!  :rofl  :rofl  :rofl

Logged
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2010, 10:44:14 AM »
In
Logged
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline grizz441

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7001
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2010, 11:33:52 AM »
Quote from: guncrasher on June 20, 2010, 09:03:46 AM
I have seen now planes crash at 200 and above in low furballing and get a ditch.  This is after having no wings or tail.
Semp

No chance, if you hit the ground going faster than 150 it's insta death.
Logged

Offline LLogann

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4947
      • Candidz.com
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2010, 11:37:46 AM »
HOLY SMOKES FugitiveMan...  When I replied, I didn't even see that......   :rofl

Quote from: The Fugitive on June 20, 2010, 09:11:14 AM
The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !



....oh and IN   :neener:

Somebody needs a smack....  
Quote from: slayer1 on June 19, 2010, 10:20:28 PM
i agree +1  :aok

~slayer~

INcredible!
Logged
See Rule #4
Now I only pay because of my friends.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #13 on: June 20, 2010, 11:57:38 AM »
Quote from: The Fugitive on June 20, 2010, 09:11:14 AM
The modeling has changed at least once since this thread was posted 5 YEARS AGO !







....oh and IN   :neener:
I don't think so, you still get killed instantly if you touch any part of your plane to any stationary object provided you're going 150 miles an hour or faster.
Logged

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Better ditching and object collision modelling
« Reply #14 on: June 20, 2010, 12:01:23 PM »


have you??? :aok
Logged
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »