Author Topic: 38 flap question?  (Read 1396 times)

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
38 flap question?
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2005, 11:47:17 AM »
Hi Kweassa,

>To me, it is clear that this critical factor which allows the P-38, a plane with a relatively large turning radius, to so often outmaneuver much tighter turning planes, is not the flaps, but it's stability during the turns.

Hm, you might be right, but wouldn't that require a separate series of tests? I'd imagine one would have to fly a maximum rate turn at constant G rate and speed while sacrificing altitude to determine sustained turn capability.

If speed and G rate are recorded, the sink rate would yield information on the energy bleed.

That might be an interesting excercise as the effects of the flaps both on turn rate and on energy could be determined from this :-)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
38 flap question?
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2005, 10:29:25 PM »
P38J at 75% fuel, fuel weight=1845lbs
109g6 at 75% fuel, fuel weight=475lbs

Experieced 38 pilots do not go around turnfighting with a full ton of internal fuel.  That is why MA results do not match.  And any 38 pilot chopping throttle just for the purpose of deploying flaps is a fool (regarding sustained turning).

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
38 flap question?
« Reply #17 on: August 22, 2005, 01:35:05 AM »
Quote
Hm, you might be right, but wouldn't that require a separate series of tests? I'd imagine one would have to fly a maximum rate turn at constant G rate and speed while sacrificing altitude to determine sustained turn capability.


 It probably would.. except I have no idea how to test something like that. Thus I had to rely on a lot of past experiences.

 However, regarding the 'stability' as the key factor rather than the flaps, is IMO pretty much a common consensus for many people(I won't say 'most').  For instance, there have been posts and threads about other planes with simular attributes which, they appear to be drastically more maneuverable than actual recorded turn radius or turn rate - the P-47s or the P-51s comes into mind.

ps)

 If you would check my turn rate testings again, you will notice the individual 'stall limiter' settings the particular plane used have been documented as well. Some planes can use the minimum setting of 0.05, others may have to use 1.0 or higher.

 This stall limiter setting, is a set value which inhibits the AoA the plane can pull - a setting of 1.0 means that the plane can pull up to 1.0 degrees before critical AoA. Ofcourse, obviously the reason why some planes use higher figures than others which use the minimal 0.05, is because those planes cannot handle 0.05 degrees before critical AoA due to serious destabilization in the roll axis. The plane doesn't immediately stallout, but it "wing-dips" like crazy, if you know what I mean. It's impossible to keep a steady turn when your plane is rocking left and right.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
38 flap question?
« Reply #18 on: August 22, 2005, 01:51:35 AM »
Quote
Experieced 38 pilots do not go around turnfighting with a full ton of internal fuel. That is why MA results do not match.


 Murdr, fuel load doesn't make much of a noticeable difference in turn radius when a certain plane is facing another plane which  inherently outmaneuvers it by a large margin.

 Unless it's a plane like the P-47N, which holds uncommonly huge amounts of internal fuel, a plane that is outturned by a Spit at 75% fuel, still will not be able to outturn it even if it has only 25% fuel.

 Again, the key difference with a smaller fuel load,  is not necessarily the plane turns better, but more stable. It's easier to handle with a lighter fuel load, so it's easier to reach and maintain that thin "edge" of absolute performance.

 I didn't test all the planes with diff. fuel loads when I did the turn tests, but some of them I did test, and that's where I draw my conclusions from. (Well, my version of interpretation of test data, anyways)

 
Quote
And any 38 pilot chopping throttle just for the purpose of deploying flaps is a fool (regarding sustained turning).


 I'll take your word for it.

 However, the point is, the P-38 can enter a turn, and tighten it's radius much faster and easier, and maintain that status far longer than any other plane in the set.

 The flaps itself, didn't have any really noticeable effects in aiding the turn - at least, the tested results show that even with flaps engaged the plane has quite a large turn radius compared to most.

 I wondered why anyone would go as far as to claim that a plane that has such large turn radius, to be able to "outturn" so many planes which clearly has smaller radius than itself.

 The answer had to be none other than the fact that it's not about the SIZE of the turn radius itself, but about how easily, quickly, and decisively one can tighten it, as compared to thers.

Offline Badboy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1226
38 flap question?
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2005, 03:17:05 PM »
Hi Guys

Here is an example of a comparison I did some time ago of the P-38L fighting a 109G6. From the EM diagram below you can see that if both pilots keep their flaps retracted the 109G6 is going to enjoy a relatively easy kill. It has a slightly better maximum sustained turn rate but a much better instantaneous turn rate at all speeds below corner velocity, and a much better turn radius.  



However, when the P-38 driver deploys his flaps as shown with the black set of curves, the situation is very different. The P-38 driver hasn't gained anything in the sustained turn, but has made a big improvement in instantaneous turn rate. For example, you can see that if both aircraft are at 155mph the P-38 will have a four degrees per second advantage and a smaller turn radius.

Of course the P-38 driver won't be able to sustain that for long, but the better P-38 drivers will keep their speed up using nose low slices, and split-s maneuvers in order to gain angles for a snap shot.  

But even then when the P-38 driver has used up his energy, they still have a trick or two up their sleeve because air combat is not just about turn rate and turn radius... another very important aspect of air combat has been left out of this discussion almost entirely.

The geometry of the fight is a vital factor, that good P-38 pilots use when they get to low speeds, and the P-38 can fly very slowly indeed.

What do I mean by geometry? Well let's take a concrete example, let's assume that the P-38 with five notches of flaps deployed and the 109G6 with no flaps are both in their best maximum sustained turns. In the EM diagram above that places them both at the point where the Ps curves intersects the stall line.

You can see in that situation the P-38 is about 25mph slower with a slight turn radius advantage... both those facts scream one circle fight to the P-38 driver, and most P-38 drivers don't even need to think about it, they just know if they don't get the guns solution provided by their initial high instantaneous turn rate, they can convert to a one circle fight as they get slow, because they are almost certainly going to win the scissors, and to save time in the reversals they use rudder to increase the roll rate.

The situation is shown below:    



This sort of geometry is the real secret of the P-38s success, and works even against the Spitfires and NIKIs simply because their best sustained turn occurs at a higher speed. Infact, in a rolling scissors, the P-38 can get so slow it can squirt almost anything out in front long enough for a shot.

Of course, experienced pilots with a good grasp of BFM know how to avoid that sort of situation, and can exploit a different form of geometry in order to deny the P-38 the sort of fight it wants.

That's not even the whole story, and it is admittedly over simplified, but I hope that helps to validate everyone's experience in the arena, because I can justify almost every viewpoint I've seen in this discussion so far :)  

Hope that helps...

Badboy
The Damned (est. 1988)
  • AH Training Corps - Retired
  • Air Warrior Trainer - Retired

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
38 flap question?
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2005, 04:05:30 PM »
As always Badboy, excellent post!


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline HoHun

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2182
38 flap question?
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2005, 04:40:36 PM »
Hi Badboy,

>That's not even the whole story, and it is admittedly over simplified, but I hope that helps to validate everyone's experience in the arena, because I can justify almost every viewpoint I've seen in this discussion so far :)  

I think it's not surprising that we can't agree on how to evaluate the genuine WW2 pilots' opinions if we can't agree on how to evaluate our own opinions! ;-)

To get technical, shouldn't the Me 109 be able to win altitude over the P-38 by sliding down the stall border to a lower turn rate, gaining climb rate while decreasing the turn radius?

(This is a slow way to win the upper hand, obviously.)

Regards,

Henning (HoHun)

Offline AmRaaM

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 349
38 flap question?
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2005, 06:17:32 PM »
only prob is p38L rolls like a 500# pig. flapped out.

i'd ride the g6 in a scissor vs p38L anyday in ah. only thing to worry about is the 38nosing across and lazering a wing off.

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
38 flap question?
« Reply #23 on: August 22, 2005, 07:00:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kweassa
Murdr, fuel load doesn't make much of a noticeable difference in turn radius when a certain plane is facing another plane which  inherently outmaneuvers it by a large margin.

I will admit that I am not an aero head like a few on the boards, but my understanding is this; At best sustained turn rate, power avalible should equal the sum of parisitic drag and induced drag.  The difference in power/weight ratio between 75% fuel and 25% fuel should be .431lbs per HP, or about 12% (in P38J).  For comparison that difference in a seafire should be .208lbs/HP.  Throw in the inherent higher parisitic drag of deployed fowler flaps compaired to split flaps, and the power deficit is even a little more.  All I am saying is the fuel load would have a proportionately higher effect on planes such as the 38 and 47.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
38 flap question?
« Reply #24 on: August 22, 2005, 08:52:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AmRaaM
only prob is p38L rolls like a 500# pig. flapped out.

i'd ride the g6 in a scissor vs p38L anyday in ah. only thing to worry about is the 38nosing across and lazering a wing off.


Everything rolls slowly at 150 mph... You want a faster roll rate, those twin rudders speed it up quite a bit. Have multi-throttle set-up? Differential power and rudder really get it moving.

Personally, the scissors is a maneuver reserved for the last resort. It's also very easy to counter. Any pilot bold enough to fly across my nose will be walking home.

Below is link to a very short film of trainer Fuseman and me filming a scissors for the AH2 website. I'm flying a Mosquito and Fuseman is in a Spit V. Notice that the Spit would not have survived the initial break, or the next reverse. I have always maintained that a scissors is little more than quick death. I do believe that I would have overshot the fireball though.... Here's the 45 second flim.

My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: August 22, 2005, 09:04:22 PM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
38 flap question?
« Reply #25 on: August 22, 2005, 11:30:04 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AmRaaM
only prob is p38L rolls like a 500# pig. flapped out.

i'd ride the g6 in a scissor vs p38L anyday in ah. only thing to worry about is the 38nosing across and lazering a wing off.


I've shot down a lot of 109 drivers that thought the same way.  Two nice big fat rudders really do wonders for the roll.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
38 flap question?
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2005, 03:37:08 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by BUG_EAF322
The 110 isnt a dogfighter and it suks in the roll and vertical.

Some do fly it real good though.
They mostly kill on the snap or headon.
But never on the tail.

I really drool when im above some 110's


couldn't disagree w/ you more.  the 110 bleeds E so fast, I easily maneuver behind 'em for a quick kill.  The 110g2 does surprisingly decent yoyo's, and is a deflection shot monster.

51kills vs. 13 deaths in a 110 this tour so far.  110 is typically my #2 killer per tour.

Have suprised many a spit in 'em.  Suddenly, i'm behind them, and they are clueless as to what to do.  Plus I use the 4x20mm 2x30mm option, so I just have to knick 'em to drop them from the skies.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline BUG_EAF322

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3153
      • http://bug322.startje.com
38 flap question?
« Reply #27 on: August 23, 2005, 08:21:48 AM »
I been in very hairy fights with pilots like Mn7 hes one of the best 110 drivers.

I know what u mean still its got a ugly roll and bad looping capability.

It suks compared to the mighty lightning :)