Author Topic: a-26  (Read 5265 times)

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: a-26
« Reply #15 on: October 22, 2010, 09:13:00 PM »
how about an A-26 with 8 nose and 10 wingmouted 50.cals

No such animal.



wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12386
Re: a-26
« Reply #16 on: October 22, 2010, 09:44:27 PM »
as stated before.. I can get behind this if I have the option of using it to put out fires ;)

JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline 800nate

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 82
Re: a-26
« Reply #17 on: October 22, 2010, 10:11:07 PM »
+1

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: a-26
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2010, 01:49:34 AM »
How's it any different?  If you HO a 110, you should expect to die.  If you HO an A-26, you should expect to die.


1) 110 has 2 x 20mm and 2 x 30 mm, low firing rate.  A-26 with 18 x .50, fast firing rate. 
2) Going back to 1#, A-26 most likely throws out 4-5 time more lead out at you then what the 110 can.
3) More gun can pack a huge punch spraying a con over a 110, have a high % hit rate.

There is the big difference. 
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Mato

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 146
Re: a-26
« Reply #19 on: October 23, 2010, 07:21:06 AM »
I think it's about to give birth!   :O

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: a-26
« Reply #20 on: October 23, 2010, 07:24:07 AM »
No such animal.



wrongway

   ohhhhhh please forgive me it was a typo, shoulda been 8 in nose and 6 in wings.


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: a-26
« Reply #21 on: October 23, 2010, 07:26:20 AM »

1) 110 has 2 x 20mm and 2 x 30 mm, low firing rate.  A-26 with 18 x .50, fast firing rate. 
2) Going back to 1#, A-26 most likely throws out 4-5 time more lead out at you then what the 110 can.
3) More gun can pack a huge punch spraying a con over a 110, have a high % hit rate.

There is the big difference. 
 

   you forget though, it only takes one 30 mm to bring a plane down,compared to how many 50.cal so your statement is moot


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: a-26
« Reply #22 on: October 23, 2010, 12:14:18 PM »
   you forget though, it only takes one 30 mm to bring a plane down,compared to how many 50.cal so your statement is moot

Yes, but compared the fire rate of the 30mm to just .50 cal.  You have a greater chance of getting a hit with the .50 cal
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: a-26
« Reply #23 on: October 23, 2010, 02:39:44 PM »
You seem to think the .50 cal had a high rate of fire.  It did not.  12.5 rounds per second is what I usually see listed for it, which puts it squarely between the Hispano Mk II 20mm cannon's 10 rounds per second and the Ho-5 20mm cannon's 15 rounds per second.

The US Navy concluded that a single M2 20mm cannon (Hispano Mk II) installation was equal to the firepower of a triple Browning .50 caliber instalation. 10 rounds per second vs 37.5 rounds per second and being equal.

The MK108 30mm cannon hits far harder for the weight of the weapon and ammo.  One MK108 is probably worth about ten .50 cals.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: a-26
« Reply #24 on: October 23, 2010, 02:49:19 PM »
Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17362
Re: a-26
« Reply #25 on: October 23, 2010, 03:21:14 PM »
who cares if they're equal or not, you ho either one of them.  you will die, either by .50 or by 20-30.  dead is dead.

semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline choker41

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 231
Re: a-26
« Reply #26 on: October 23, 2010, 03:54:17 PM »
Cobia if A-26 flies similar to the A-20 I think we should keep it as a wish.  You sir are too good already to be given even more .50's to punish us all with  :salute
Formerly known as choker41
Proud member of the Swampdragons
IN GAME ID:   FUBAR

Offline 800nate

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 82
Re: a-26
« Reply #27 on: October 23, 2010, 03:57:32 PM »
+111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 :aok

Offline JHerne

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 659
Re: a-26
« Reply #28 on: October 23, 2010, 05:16:46 PM »
Performance wise, I think A-26 handles more like a Mossie than an A-20. Their top speeds are 11mph apart, with the Mossie having the edge.

Personally, I think the A-26 was operational long enough to warrant it in the game. While the Mossie is nice to have as a perked bomber, I'd still prefer something with better ground attack capabilities.

J

Skunkworks AvA Researcher and
Primary Cause of Angst

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: a-26
« Reply #29 on: October 28, 2010, 03:08:57 PM »
+1 on the A-26
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ