« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 162 163 164 [165] 166 167 168 ... 172   Go Down

Author Topic: B-29 Super Fortress  (Read 113034 times)

Offline StokesAk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3665
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2460 on: July 06, 2010, 06:36:29 PM »
No.
Logged
Strokes

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2461 on: July 06, 2010, 06:52:35 PM »
Quote from: 1Boner on July 06, 2010, 04:23:56 PM
A Zillion???

Thats ALOT!!! :O

Sorry I checked the past threads, its actually he said no a gazillion times.  (I think that's even more, isnt it?)

semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline ImADot

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6215
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2462 on: July 06, 2010, 08:37:52 PM »
I just did a google search, and he's actually said no a googol times.
Logged
My Current Rig:
GigaByte GA-X99-UD4 Mobo w/ 16Gb RAM
Intel i7 5820k, Win7 64-bit
NVidia GTX 970 4Gb ACX 2.0
Track IR, CH Fighterstick, CH Pro Throttle, CH Pro Pedals

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2463 on: July 06, 2010, 10:20:33 PM »
Quote from: guncrasher on July 06, 2010, 06:52:35 PM
Sorry I checked the past threads, its actually he said no a gazillion times.  (I think that's even more, isnt it?)

semp
Quote from: ImADot on July 06, 2010, 08:37:52 PM
I just did a google search, and he's actually said no a googol times.

That is a lot either though he only made 5932. 
Logged
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2464 on: July 06, 2010, 10:26:05 PM »
Quote from: Bronk on July 06, 2010, 05:18:07 PM
Umm no he didn't and it was the skuzzy that did the filter.
I want the rubber ducky thread back!!! skuzzy pweeeeseeee!!???!??!?!? :confused:


In before the B29 thread merger and inevitable lockage :rolleyes:
Logged
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17425
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2465 on: July 07, 2010, 01:36:19 AM »
Quote from: ImADot on July 06, 2010, 08:37:52 PM
I just did a google search, and he's actually said no a googol times.

Isnt a googol what they yell when somebody scores in soccer?

semp
Logged
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline fbWldcat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2970
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2466 on: July 07, 2010, 01:49:43 AM »
Quote from: lilsquid on July 06, 2010, 11:13:12 AM
Lets see a plane we all can agree on... The B-29 Rubber Ducky. I would like to be able to flatten an entire town in two passes and have leftovers for the base, because gameplay isn't gamey enough.  :cry I can only up Lancasters, but they have no underside protection and can only fly around 280 mph which is way too slow for those dang uppers which seem to always catch up to me in time to shoot me down.  :cry I would like the B-29 so I can be teh big bomber guy. :D


Everything you said without saying it.
Logged
Quote from: Shuffler on April 07, 2011, 10:37:33 AM
Landing is overrated.
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I: I took the one less traveled by." - Robert Frost
"Uncommon valor was a common virtue." <S>

Offline whipster22

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 458
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2467 on: July 07, 2010, 05:43:39 AM »
Give him the B model do a little research  :D
Logged
just dewbing up the bbs
baby seal

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2468 on: July 07, 2010, 09:08:40 AM »
This thread deserves a     .
Logged
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline SEseph

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2469 on: July 07, 2010, 09:20:47 AM »
I never would have believed you could beat a dead horse this many times.  :O

And by extension, when Skuzzy or who ever changed the name to "Rubber Ducky" did so, I could only assume, it was with HiTech's blessing.  :aok

I think they should change it back to Rubber Ducky again... BRING BACK THE DUCKY :rock
Logged
BOWL Axis CO 2014 BoB13 JG52 XO DSG2 Axis S. Cmdr 2012 WSDG Allied CO 2012 Multiple GL/XO Side/Section CO/XO since early '00s
If at first you don't succeed, try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W.C.Fields

Offline JBJB710

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2470 on: September 28, 2010, 03:29:26 PM »
Do you think that the "Boeing B-29 Superfortress" should be in the game to?

Logged
Cipher (a.k.a. "The Demon Lord")
108th Tactical Fighter Squadron
"Wardog Squadron"

Offline Dichotomy

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12391
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2471 on: September 28, 2010, 03:36:08 PM »
Run for the hills JBJB...
Logged
JG11 - Dicho37Only The Proud Only The Strong AH Players who've passed on :salute

Offline DEECONX

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1502
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2472 on: September 28, 2010, 03:40:47 PM »
Logged

Offline Jayhawk

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3909
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2473 on: September 28, 2010, 04:01:04 PM »
Sweet!! It's actually been a while since I've seen one of these.
Logged
LOOK EVERYBODY!  I GOT MY NAME IN LIGHTS!

Quote from: Skuzzy on October 25, 2010, 12:28:52 PM
Folks, play nice.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: B-29 Super Fortress
« Reply #2474 on: September 28, 2010, 04:12:29 PM »
This is all Oakrangers fault.  :devil
Logged
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.
Pages: 1 ... 162 163 164 [165] 166 167 168 ... 172   Go Up
« previous next »