Originally posted by Krusty
The Eastern Front (Russia) had inferior enemy aircraft. The hard fighting was on the Western Front (Europe), and the best (newest) aircraft were sent there.
Hi,
this for sure isnt right!
The Russians had very good planes from 1943 onward and before, they was still even to the most common west planes(Hurricane, P40, Gladiator, Beaufort, Blenheim, SpitV).
The russian simply had the tactical disadvantage of a 'ground support airforce', similar to the RAF in Africa, where the Luftwaffe was simmilar successful like over russia.
Strangewise over germany the Luftwaffe HQ did force the Geschwader to fight in tactical disadvanatge, by splitting the groups all over germany and therefor their power. The HQ simply didnt listen to the fighterleaders, who did ask for massive '1000 fighter intercepts' instead of the splitted powerless attacks.
The eastfront got 1st class planes, this front Hitler did preffer!
In the east the 109 simply was the better fighter(no B17´s, very fast climbing interceptor and very good at high alt), while the 190´s was better vs the Spitfires and B17´s(here they had time to climb and enough alt to dive away vs the Spitfires).
Therfore the east got mainly the 190F+G´s + 109s , while the west got 190A + D´s + 109´s as high alt cover.
That the east front got less good planes is a myth!
I guess the 190A4/5/6´s in 1944 got the new engines and guns, they wasnt the old 190A4/5/6´s anymore.
Greetings, Knegel