Author Topic: Super vrs Uber  (Read 21016 times)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #330 on: October 14, 2005, 09:43:31 AM »
Quote
A series


I meant depends on which Anton, Angus.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #331 on: October 14, 2005, 10:00:06 AM »
Hey again.
Would you happen to have some numbers on production on Antons as well as performance charts between the various ones.
If I remember it right your Sweetheart is the 190A9 running on some strong juices ;)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #332 on: October 14, 2005, 10:10:38 AM »
Yes I pretty much have all that, Angus.  I also have many of the design changes to the motor documented.  There is also physical evidence to back up the documents.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #333 on: October 14, 2005, 11:04:28 AM »
Good to know!
Out of your head, what would you consider to be the most common 190 of WW2? I mean, either through production or useage. (Usually has a relation). 190A5? or 190A8?
I know you have a several subvariants as with all aircraft, - so as an answer for the 109 would be 109G somethig and for the Spitfire would be the V or IX something (probably the dull middle sort of the V).
So what would it be and out of curiousity, - how would you lineup the 190's in AH?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #334 on: October 14, 2005, 11:35:28 AM »
FW190A8 was the most common FW190A and one of the better performing fighter variants.

There is a thread on the line up already done.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #335 on: October 15, 2005, 10:15:26 AM »
Link??
Anyway, any of you flying over the weekend? How about giving some hell with a Spitty and a 190 winging ;)
???
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #336 on: October 16, 2005, 02:10:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kev367th
Subtle Humble lol.

Hell look at the upcoming scenrio,
Initally all Malta had was some Hurris and 3 Gladiators, they failed there also.

In fact much later after the Spit V had been delivered and Malta was secure one German officer commented something along the lines of "The Malta Spits are at it again, they are running circles around us."
I'm sure someone can come up with the exact details.


I'm amazed at how these threads turn into meaningless dribble. Thats not ment in anyway as a "slam" to the parties on either side who often provide a tremendous volume of fasinating (but not really relevent) information.

War is simply the application of force to achieve a specific goal. The "perceived slant" toward "american or allied" weapons of war is nothing other than the by product of the fact overall the americans waged war better then anyone else in history (both in WW2 and today). The facts are that americam/allied weapons of war were for the most part better across the board where it counted. From the 1st day of the war till the end...

Logistics, training and tactics all come into play....but in the end all countries are blessed with inordinate numbers of young men (and women) who will walk (and die) in harms way to protect that which they hold dear. Some of the same brave Poles who failed (but not without victories) during the blitzkrieg found fame and achieved a steller record with the polish RAF squads. French aviators who failed in 1940 fought on with distinction with the russians.

There is no question that german aviators persevered against amazing odds and almost hopeless circumstances thruout much of the war. And that the scores of the expertain are a lasting testimony to the skill, courage and tenacity of the luftwaffe.

However if you look at history you'll find the germans were never the true victors in sustained air combat on any front at any time in the war. You can find no historical example of an "aviation victory" anywhere in luftwaffe history.

German loses in poland were actually quite high under the circumstances. In France the germans were fought to about a standstill in the air. They failed miserably at Dunkirk and in the BoB. Although they inflicted higher casualties during the 1941/42 "circus & rubarb" wars they did so with the benifit of both a superior plane (190A3 vs SpitV) and the tactical advanage of picking times and places of combat. On the other hand they had no ability to project any offensive capability which was the true design intent of the Luftwaffe as an entity....so from 1941 they were effectively nuetered in the west.

They failed miserably at Malta and failed misserably in the east as well when it counted. So by 1943....long before the sheer numbers caught up...the luftwaffe ahd taken its place as the least effective and most ineficient airforce in the world. The one that acheived absolutely not a single victory of its own anywhere at anytime during the critical phase of the war when germany had a chance to win. That failure led to the inevitable "meat grinder" late in the war.

So those of you who are "debating" the german side of this equation have a simple choice to make. You can blame the total failure of the luftwaffe on either the weapons of war....or the brave men who tried and often died in an attempt to protect the fatherland.

As a final thought on this topic I'll pose a question of "alternate reality". Had the May 1944 scenario been reversed with Germanys situation in the east stabalized and England under Strategic bombardment....what would you see happening....

Heres my take...

Allied tactical air would make the use of the channel bases impossible....german bomber forces would be unable to mass close to england so german bomber command would be forced to launch from germany or northren france holland etc. (will assume german dev of a 4 engine bomber)......

So hunter/killer squds of P 4x20mm P 51(B,D) would sweep the marshalling points while mosquitos would try and hit bombers as they prepped for missions. As the bomber formations turned for england P-47's would escort squads of 2x37 (or 4 x 20mm) P-38's to the bomber stream while a second flight of ponies would engage the german escort fighters. As the germans hit the coastal area RAF spit IX's & XIV's would come down from there 37,000 combat patterns to slash thru any remaining escorts. Meanwhile RAF mosquito's would take on the heavies while Typhoons, A26's and US jugs would have been interdicting luftwaffe channel fields preventing the 109s from successfully launching the attack cap.

Inspite of tremendous pressure literally from takeoff  80% of the attacking force has slogged its way to the channel itself and is forming up for the run to IP. The original and mid german escort has suffered heavily but the bombers are still a functional unit....but low on fuel and ammo with many suffering significant damage the remaining 70% of the escorts decend into the maelstrom to find there designated landing fields under attack and there comrades now torn between the need to stay alive themselfs, protect the bombers now above them or watch as there fatiqued brethren are forced to land/ditch under fire.

Between all these impediments only 50% of the 109s tasked as the IP cap manage to make it out and climb up to the bomber stream. As the bombers fly over the coast the british send in the final reserve as RAF F7F's slam into the bomber stream. Armed with 4 x 20mm, 4 x 50cal they inflict staggering losses as they mix it up over the english coast...even as they themselfs take a pounding from the 20mm cannon of the german bombers....with german bombs out the F7F's now turn (as per instructions) on the german 109 escort. With a top speed of 435 mph at alt and superior pure turning ability the brits can keep the germans fighting....some 109s got down...and so do some of the F7F's but the short legs of the 109s force the germans hand as many have to either run or ditch......

meanwhile the remaining bombers turn for home......with the channel fields under siege and the 109s based there engages the bombers are hoping to get in range of the return escort of 190s and 262's enroute to escort them home.

A cloud of planes to the north over the channel spells salvation...untill they are identified as RNAS F6F's....as the 2 x 20mm 4 x 50cal hellcats tear into the already staggered bomber stream the formation disinigrates as planes head to the deck to make the best of it.....

The german "return cap" leader sadly circles his troops and sends the 262's back 1st as he see's the ever present ponies of the US aircorp pickle their DT's as they role in......

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #337 on: October 16, 2005, 04:30:34 PM »
Quote
I'm amazed at how these threads turn into meaningless dribble.



see above

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #338 on: October 16, 2005, 05:32:05 PM »
LOL.....

you'll sit and argue trivial issues but not even contermplate the operatonal realities of fighting a war. The german 109 was incapable of sustained offensive operations in 1939....let alone in 1944. You'll argue the merits of the bird under circumstances that actually favor it entirely....yet give no operational credit to the design or capabilities of the men and machines on the other side.

Had the luftwaffe ever attempted any type of stategic offensive vs the west from mid 1942 on they would have suffered overwhelming losses. The reason they didnt try was simply because they recognized this simple truth.

I'm still waiting for your explanation on how and why the luftwaffe had the tar beat out of it at Kuban by a bunch of 2nd rate pilots in 3rd rate worn out lend lease planes? Your attempting to argue the superiority of the 109 vs the spit or mustang when history clearly shows that its not even a match for a P-39. And we're talking about a time when the germans had both operational advantages and numbers and where the total focus of the german luftwaffe and army was. So the germanys went from being fought to a standstill at BoB to being mauled at Kuban to being so much cannon fodder over germany.....

The one constant.....the vaunted 109......easily the worst combat aircraft fielded by any major combatant in WW2 as its primary front line fighter. The 109 was actually rated as significantly inferior to the C205 by the luftwaffe itself....funny you guys never bring that fact up.......

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Crumpp

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #339 on: October 16, 2005, 06:35:14 PM »
I'm not a 109 fan.

All the best,

Crumpp

Offline Kurfürst

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 921
      • http://www.kurfurst.org
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #340 on: October 17, 2005, 12:54:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp
Really?  You should tell that to Oscar, Heinz, or Kurt.  The impression I get is the 20 Mustangs was a nightmare, not the one.

All the best,

Crumpp


Hmmm. Curious. Too bad you can't read Tobak's book. There was a saying among Hungarian pilots at that time, exaclty what you pointed out :

"There is no such thing as a lonely Mustang."


PS : Doh, I just notice I missed somebody getting banned. :/ Anyay, gotta go now to feed on some turkish food ! :D
« Last Edit: October 17, 2005, 01:03:27 PM by Kurfürst »
The Messerschmitt Bf 109 Performance Resource Site
http://www.kurfurst.org

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #341 on: October 17, 2005, 04:11:07 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kurfürst
PS : Doh, I just notice I missed somebody getting banned. :/ Anyay, gotta go now to feed on some turkish food ! :D


Yup, finally looks like they got rid of Otto for good.

I noticed that Qs-man had to do some editing over at Butch's board to get rid of the rants in the 109F thread.

Part of Kurfürst's post in the tread before it was deleted:
Knowing the above, I wonder the reason behind posting dive limitations about the 109G - that may sound very bad to someone unfamiliar with airplane manuals, but in fact quite common, standard warnings found typically in fighter manuals - and then the dive tests that eventually resulted a written-off plane, which was btw different aerodynamically, having the best high altitude merlin 70 engine, and no armament or cannon protusions at all?

Please get your facts straight Kurfurst.

EN409 had a Merlin 61, not a Merlin 70, installed and went to a OTU on Feb 2 1945 before failing to return on Apr 7 1945. Hardly written off. PL827 had a Merlin 70 installed and did not arrive at Farnborough until May 6 1944, a week after the .89 dive of EN409. PL827 replaced EN409 which was having a new engine being fitted.

The speed was measured with a comb with 19 pitots.

Offline humble

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6434
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #342 on: October 17, 2005, 08:40:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Crumpp
I'm not a 109 fan.

All the best,

Crumpp


Good, we have something in common.

I've always been amazed that the germans would seemingly ignore the quantum leap the 190 provided and continue to waste both design time and manufacturing on an obsolete airframe like the 109. The 190 at least solved a significant number of the ergonomic and engineering issues that doomed the 109 from the start.

All the best to you as well

"The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it."-Pres. Thomas Jefferson

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #343 on: October 20, 2005, 02:19:13 AM »
"I've always been amazed that the germans would seemingly ignore the quantum leap the 190 provided and continue to waste both design time and manufacturing on an obsolete airframe like the 109."

Stirring the pot, huh? Maybe it just was not as bad as you suggest. After all, it remained lighter than the 190 and thus had different qualities in aircombat. For some reason flying the 190 in AH I feel safe if there are a few friendly 109s about. I think that 109s and 190s make a very good team tactically.  ;)

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Super vrs Uber
« Reply #344 on: October 20, 2005, 03:25:32 AM »
Fw190As and Fw190Cs, with the DB engine, would have been a good combination.