Author Topic: So I'm watching "Band of Brothers"...  (Read 1299 times)

Offline gofaster

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6622
And the British Churchill, for comparison
« Reply #30 on: October 02, 2005, 10:37:59 PM »


Quote
Despite the serious teething problems in its mechanics, the British Infantry Tank MK.IV or the "Churchill" went on to earn a high reputation among the WW2 British armored fighting vehicles. Following the tradition of the rhombic-shaped predecessors during WW1, its design priority was placed on heavy armor, a wide trench crossing capacity and the ability to travel across the shell-torn battlefields. Speed was not considered to be essential, since its main role would be to escort and support the infantry. Christened the "Churchill" after the Prime Minister of England, it began to arrive at the Tank Regiments in June 1941. The Churchill tank stable is classified into several types according to the main armament used, or the hull and turret construction. The MK.VII was radically different from the earlier models, with the hull and turret completely new in structure. The entire hull was welded, rather than being riveted. The maximum armor thickness was increased from 102mm to 152mm. Consequently, the weight augmented to 40 tons, resulting in a reduction in top speed from 18 to 13 mph. The turret was redesigned for higher strength and improved productivity. The four walls were a single casting of varying thickness, onto which the roof plate was welded. The powerful 75mm gun was adopted as the main armament. The active service of the Churchill tanks, especially from D-Day onwards, is worthy of the name of the principal British tank.

Offline rshubert

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1462
So I'm watching "Band of Brothers"...
« Reply #31 on: October 03, 2005, 06:46:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Howitzer
I suppose I've commented on this before, but in case I haven't, I'll do it now.   History obviously has its place in all of our hearts, but I just don't see adding a GV to the game that will just get pwned by anything but an M8 for history's sake.  If it were a pershing or something else that could stand up 1 on 1 with the german armor, I'd be fine with it.  But the simple fact that the American advantage of simply producing more tanks than the Germans does not apply to the gameplay we see here, so it is mostly irrelevant and makes for lopsided fights.

Just my thoughts...


Thus sprake Howitzer, a man with a grand total of 50 minutes in GVs in the last three tours combined.  Obviously, an expert.  Listen to him, fellas--he knows all.

Offline MrRiplEy[H]

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11633
So I'm watching "Band of Brothers"...
« Reply #32 on: October 03, 2005, 07:00:40 AM »
Interesting difference with two versions of the same story. The other story has the crew killed instantly after they get out of the tank while the other story says the crew was taken POW later on.

Which one is correct?
Definiteness of purpose is the starting point of all achievement. –W. Clement Stone

Offline FBBone

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 549
So I'm watching "Band of Brothers"...
« Reply #33 on: October 03, 2005, 08:17:19 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rino
Welp, if you put in a latewar Sherman to match the latewar
PzKw IV, the ownage should be pretty even.  Of course the GV
war here is pretty much fantasyland to begin with.


LMAO, what here ISN"T fantasyland???

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
The Pershing
« Reply #34 on: October 03, 2005, 08:43:54 AM »
The Pershing seems a little Vietnamish though, but I could be wrong