No offense, Gunfighter, but I don't know what use it is to drag people over to their boards.
You are upset that there are untruths posted here? I find far more untruths about AH over there, including its history, who is responsible for AH, etc. I was here when AH started, it was light years ahead of where WWIIO is today, even from the beginning. My opinion, of course.
A final thought, though; if AH players cannot post some biased information here (assuming you're right, that anything that disagrees with your view is an outright lie), where should they post it? If you come to a competitor's board and post propaganda, what do you expect the response to be?
Of course one can't post anything at the CRS board unless one is a member, right? This is supposedly to prevent flames, yet flames continue- so long as the flames aren't directed at Hatch and company. Minute that happens there is this nasty TOS e-mail that arrives. In short, insults are great as long as they are not directed at the company. Remember Triad's banning? Remember how he was making the point that a recent banning hadn't occurred because of what was said, but to whom it had been said? Sure you do. And he was right.
Play what you want, it is no concern to me. If someone asks for opinions on a game I have played, I'll give it to the best of my ability. I sure don't appreciate being called a liar because I don't agree with your view of it. And, I might add, it illustrates perfectly the behavior Westy so correctly identified. Your board is rank with it.
Finally, as of 1.40 the f/m of WWIIO was terribly flawed. I've read the readme on 1.5 and it doesn't mention changes to f/m, unless I missed something. So tell me, besides the framerate loss people are talking about (as if the game could afford it), how does it suck less than it did from a f/m perspective?