Author Topic: Is the 757 overpowered  (Read 891 times)

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Is the 757 overpowered
« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2005, 02:05:06 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Staga
IIRC turbines are in their most efficient use when running close to the max rpm (fuel usage vs thrust) or at least they were 10 years ago.


They're definitely not running at 'very low' power settings, but closer to max, although not _really_ close to max.
Most planes with max thrust could easily overspeed beyond approved structucal speed limit.
However theres another thing to it also: maintenance.
Higher RPM means higher maintenance cost, which is one reason why pilots can choose derated power settings for takeoff and climb.

The thing with jets is the temperature - higher altitude means colder outside temperature and that makes jet engines more efficient.
The colder it is, the less fuel is needed for a distance.
Which again means less power.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2005, 02:10:34 AM by Fishu »

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
Re: Is the 757 overpowered
« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2005, 02:36:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by RAIDER14
From recent flights on 757s and asking pilots at the AA maintenence facility at AFW I think the 757's engines might be to powerful for the aircraft


listen  2 the engine noise
http://www.flightlevel350.com/viewer.php?id=4751

When ur fighting against the "pull" of a planet, a plane can never be overpowered.  Like John Travolta said, "You can never have too much power", you just need a throttle!  

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline LLv34 Jarsci

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 503
Is the 757 overpowered
« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2005, 05:22:08 AM »
Its nice to watch 757 which is pretty much empty of fuel, gargo and pax to take-off. After 700m run up we go, and Bae Hawk has no chance to climb with it. About 2 mins to fl 100 from rolling...