Originally posted by Fencer51
Guppy,
Thanks as always for your help.
Do you still have Paul Coggan's book? If so, look at page 16. That's the photo I am talking about. Note the camera foward of the star.
Should I do the skin like that or go with the standard F-6D ? Did they modify the camera locations as time went on? That photo was taken in June 1945 after the cessation of hostilities.
Any opinion is welcome on this.
Cheers,
Hmmm, hadn't noticed that before. So here's the photo in question.
Couple of possibilities to me. One is that it's a blip in the photo, or someone did a bad job 'photoshopping' it to clean it up. It seems to be missing the fuselage fuel tank cap and the static port below the rear of the canopy as well.
Now the profile artist in the Osprey book seems to think it's a camera. He included it.
Is it possible? I suppose, but it would mean removing the radios, fuselage fuel tank and placing a camera right above the radiator. That doesn't make much sense. There were plenty of examples where they fixed the camera to the back of the armor plate behind the pilot. That wouldn't require as much surgery on the 51. But I suppose as the war was winding down the need for the fuselage tank was much less for a 51 operating on the continent. I know that they quit using them postwar anyway.
But the idea that they'd stick a camera in that spot when it was so full (see below) doesn't make a lot of sense, so I tend to think it's a blemish on the photo.
I suppose the other option is it is a formation assembly light as was done on a a number of Mustangs flown by Flight leads etc. An example shown on Pierce McKennon's Ridge Runner. The second light was back on the fuselage near the star & bar.
In the end it's all just my speculation of course. But I'd go without the 'camera port' in front of the star and bar. BTW can you tell I like images?