« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 14   Go Down

Author Topic: Reduced Ranges  (Read 5610 times)

Offline bagrat

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1936
fuel burn rate
« Reply #15 on: January 03, 2006, 02:42:33 AM »
about the unfair advantage that is said to be given to american planes, yeah american planes can fly longer (we all know why, no reason to explain) but everything still works out. Most planes can fly for around over half an hour anyway, which is generally more than enough time to get from A to B.

Besides fuel burn rate really has no effect on peoples choice of plane, many people still fly the la-7 wich probably has the least flying time.

Oh and I suppose the reason fuel burn rate is changed is because if everyplane had actual burn rate there would be no reason for loading on more than 25% of fuel,  ultimately meaning the effect of weighted planes would not have as large an effect.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2006, 02:45:51 AM by bagrat »
Logged
Last post by bagrat - The last thing you'll see before your thread dies since 2005.

Offline Harry

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #16 on: January 03, 2006, 03:41:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lusche
Now THAT is complete nonsense. I fly Lala. Never have problems to climbing to combat. Always able to loiter for 30min+.


5k is not combat alt. 20k+ is. By the time to get to 20k you've expended half your fuel.
Logged

Offline FTJR

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1996
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #17 on: January 03, 2006, 04:05:05 AM »
Quote
5k is not combat alt. 20k+ is. By the time to get to 20k you've expended half your fuel.



The La7's optimum combat altitude is 20K??
Logged
Bring the Beaufighter to Aces High
Raw Prawns      

B.O.S.S. "Beaufighter Operator Support Services" 
Storms and Aeroplanes dont mix

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Re: fuel burn rate
« Reply #18 on: January 03, 2006, 04:07:02 AM »
The may trouble is it twist reality as it transform long range fighter into tactical fighter and tactical fighter in something wich never existed.
Logged

Offline Harry

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #19 on: January 03, 2006, 05:20:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by FTJR
The La7's optimum combat altitude is 20K??


Yes, 19-20k for the La-7.
Logged

Offline Harry

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Re: Re: fuel burn rate
« Reply #20 on: January 03, 2006, 05:21:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by straffo
The may trouble is it twist reality as it transform long range fighter into tactical fighter and tactical fighter in something wich never existed.


Exactly.
Logged

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #21 on: January 03, 2006, 07:02:20 AM »
Harry keep that La7 under 8k, you'll find it performs better and its more fun.

Above 12k a P51 or P47 is going to have a definate edge.
Logged

Offline Delirium

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7276
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #22 on: January 03, 2006, 07:32:51 AM »
Harry is a pretty good troll... look at everyone fall for his bait.

No thanks Harry, I just ate.
Logged
Delirium
80th "Headhunters"
Retired AH Trainer (but still teach the P38 selectively)

I found an air leak in my inflatable sheep and plugged the hole! Honest!

Offline Harry

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #23 on: January 03, 2006, 08:43:44 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ghosth
Harry keep that La7 under 8k, you'll find it performs better and its more fun.

Above 12k a P51 or P47 is going to have a definate edge.


I only meant the La-7's best altitude is 19-20k, not its best altitude compared to other fighters. I don't fly the La-7. Sometimes I fly the La-5. Over the Russian front the VVS and LW normally operated in the 10-20k "medium alt" range. Bombers around 10k with fighters on top.
Logged

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #24 on: January 03, 2006, 08:51:36 AM »
I actually think they should model Luftwaffe fighters in there own Uber arena where they have unlimited fuel and ammo and when they have damage they can fly through giant floating pictures of the Fueher which will re-arm and re-fuel your plane.

Conversley all American aircraft will have to fly with full fuel tanks and 100% ammo all the time and all Spitfires will have to fly with drop tanks while towing a glider filled with napalm (it's only fair).

That should set the realism about right for everyone:aok
Logged

Offline Harry

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 145
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #25 on: January 03, 2006, 08:59:26 AM »
I don't fly LW either. I usually fly F6F or Spits.
Logged

Offline simshell

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #26 on: January 03, 2006, 09:11:02 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Harry
See Rule #4


the US fighters dont need to be mauverable to win dogfights there fast heavly armed great highspeed control hog will beat most planes without having to  be  more mauverable

its like the P47 its a great plane but turning and burning may not be the smartest thing to do

but of course you can allways call it the pilot when you lose so as not to lose the debate
« Last Edit: March 01, 2006, 12:15:04 PM by Skuzzy »
Logged
known as Arctic in the main

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #27 on: January 03, 2006, 09:43:18 AM »
Anyone else think it's funny that he's railing against the unfair advantage of range in American rides, but one of his preferred mounts IS an American fighter?
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline straffo

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10029
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #28 on: January 03, 2006, 09:52:06 AM »
BTw I still wonder how it influence the behaviour of planes as they are loosing some weight twice faster as they should ...
Logged

Offline Bodhi

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8698
Reduced Ranges
« Reply #29 on: January 03, 2006, 10:03:03 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Delirium
Harry is a pretty good troll... look at everyone fall for his bait.

No thanks Harry, I just ate.


lol, yeap, you are correct.... (swims away missing large portion of lip)
Logged
I regret doing business with TD Computer Systems.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 ... 14   Go Up
« previous next »