Hello Momus,
The critical difference in your analogy is that Deuteronomy 7 refers to instructions given to the nation of Israel thousands of years ago in the midst of the Herem. Those specific instructions no longer apply. "The Reliance of the Traveller" however, is an explanation of Quranic law that is still bought and referred to by hundreds of thousands of Sunni Muslims worldwide. The instructions in the Quran and the Hadiths are still being followed. The idea that it is acceptable to lie to infidels in times of war, and to break treaties in order to advance the greater good of the Dar El Islam is a concept that Millions of Muslims subscribe to, not just Osama. We had a long discussion of this on other controversial portions of Sharia during a study group way back in 1989 before OBL was even on the radar screen.
Do you think OBL was raised and educated in a Vaccuum? He and men like Zarqawi actually understand traditional Islam very well, and certainly their actions are in no way at odds with those of the prophet. That's not just my take on it, that's one of the reasons they are so popular with the Ummah internationally.
In any event, Westerners don't understand the "permissible lie", because our society is still based in part on the command "You shall not bear false witness" and the understanding that we shouldn't do what we know to be evil even if our overall objective is good. For us, even if we are liars by nature, we understand lies to be bad. That's why we feel so guilty today for all those treaties made in bad faith with Indians.
I know you desperately want this all to be about one gangly Saudi Arabian, but there's a reason his T-Shirts sell so well in Islamabad and why AQ can easily plant cells in Mosques in London, Paris, Jakarta, Singapore, the Phillipines, the United States, Thailand, etc ad nauseum.
Momus, the truth is Bin Laden is a symptom, not the actual disease.
- SEAGOON