Author Topic: Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$  (Read 3973 times)

Offline wetrat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2117
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #150 on: February 21, 2006, 08:35:48 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by DoKGonZo
I can't wait for the next update so we can argue about something different.
Yeah, this one is stale. Fix the damn flaps already so I can beat a new horse :furious
Army of Muppets

Offline gatt

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2441
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #151 on: February 22, 2006, 01:11:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by YUCCA
Heres what the LW whiners need.




I see that those tires are obviously undersized, engine underpowered and turning behaviour altered by an high CoG .... prety useless in the Main and above all in an historical scenario :rofl
"And one of the finest aircraft I ever flew was the Macchi C.205. Oh, beautiful. And here you had the perfect combination of italian styling and german engineering .... it really was a delight to fly ... and we did tests on it and were most impressed." - Captain Eric Brown

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #152 on: February 22, 2006, 05:21:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Um, Mossie.  Far more porked than any Fw190 in AH.  


Mossieeeeee!!!:)
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #153 on: February 22, 2006, 03:31:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Um, Mossie.  Far more porked than any Fw190 in AH.

Not that I hold it against HTC.  I tried to dig up the data needed to unpork it and while I do have some info on it, it isn't in charts really and is by extrrapolating data.

The only hard Mossie issue is known by HTC already and should be fixed whenever the Mossie gets redone.


   mossie was a light bomber not only attack plane,
Should be threated like IL2, i would like to have it with outside view, uppin CAPed bases and HO vulchers with those Hisbozukas:)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #154 on: February 22, 2006, 03:41:49 PM »
the "bomber" version had no forward armaments. If you want that, sure I say give it the F3 view. The version WE have is the figher/bomber, no different than the p47 fighter/bomber, or the a20g fighter/bomber. It should not have F3 enabled.

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15462
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #155 on: February 22, 2006, 03:43:22 PM »
I don't think any aircraft should have anything but in-cockpit views.

Offline wetrat

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2117
Why Porking the LW does NOT make HTC $$
« Reply #156 on: February 22, 2006, 03:46:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Brooke
I don't think any aircraft should have anything but in-cockpit views.
Agreed. Those F3 views are silly. So the pilot can't see a damn thing in IL2's.... good, they couldn't see anything in the real world either.
Army of Muppets