Author Topic: attention scenario players  (Read 1355 times)

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
attention scenario players
« on: February 20, 2006, 07:40:52 AM »
Wanted:  Commanding Officer for Pearl Harbor scenario to run December 2006

The scenario Pearl Harbor 2006 is about ten months away.  We would like to start selecting candidates for Commanding Officer (CO).  

Pearl Harbor is a popular scenario that has run in the past.  It has an interesting command structure because of the much larger number of players on the Japanese side.  To accommodate this asymmetric situation, participation in the scenario is divided into three groups:  Team Alpha, Team Beta, and Team Zeke.  Team Zeke flies all the Zeros and is under the command of the IJN CO.  Team Alpha starts as the US, and Team Beta starts as IJN command and flies the non-Zero element of the Japanese side.  Three frames are fought, and then Team Alpha and Team Beta switch roles for the next three frames.  Thus, Team Alpha and Team Beta both get their turns being the US and the Japanese, and whoever is the Japanese side commands Team Zeke as a resource.

The Team Alpha CO is already selected – Jordi – who has been a CO in Pearl Harbor twice before.  Team Zeke will be headed up by Leviathn and the Blue Knights Squadron.  

We are now looking for a CO for Team Beta.  Besides formulating Team Beta’s strategy, making the strategic calls on game day, and selecting command staff and Group Leaders, the Team Beta CO will have the opportunity to influence the event’s design and implementation by being a core member of the development team from the start.

Pearl Harbor is a fun scenario that is perfectly balanced (because of the side switch aspect) and thoroughly play tested.  If being Team Beta CO sounds interesting to you, we would be very pleased to get an application from you.  Please send completed applications to:

PearlHarbor2006@gmail.com


There are many qualities of a good CO:  being communicative and in touch with the team, being able to recruit capable players to serve as GL’s, being able to recruit players in general to fill out the ranks, being able to make sure the team is proficient and has practiced enough, having the experience to formulate battle strategies, and so on.  The questions below are intended to get your views on such various things.

---- Questionnaire ---- (copy and paste into e-mail please, intersperse answers)

What is your Aces High message-board name?

What is your Aces High in-flight name?

Why would you like to be CO?

Are you willing to put in the time required to be CO of a scenario and if so how much time do you believe it takes?

In which scenarios have you flown?

In which scenarios have you served as a Group Leader, Commanding Officer, or any other executive capacity?

How often do you visit the Aces High message board?

How often to you post on the Aces High message board?

When someone sends you e-mail, typically how long is it before you respond?

Who are some pilots you’d try to recruit into GL spots?

How would you recruit players in general?

What are your ideas for getting as many players as possible to practice?

Are you a member of a squad and if so which one?

Do you have good relationships with any other squads and if so which ones?

Does your squad cooperate with any others and if so in what way?

Are you well known in any particular arenas (such as main arena or axis vs. allies)?

Are you well liked in those arenas?

Are you organized and if so what are some examples of that?

Are you happy that there are no further questions in this questionnaire? :)

Our goal is to help bring about the most-enjoyable, most-involving scenarios possible, with large participation from the Aces High player base.  Selection of CO’s has a major impact on that goal, so we are very grateful that you took the time to fill out this questionnaire.  We truly appreciate it and appreciate your interest in scenarios!  If you have any suggestions on ways to improve any aspect of scenarios, including the CO-selection process, please let us know.
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
attention scenario players
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2006, 10:02:35 AM »
Booking 10 months in advance???Culero, get rid of those oestrogens dude!!!

Saw (planning 2 days ahead is too far ahead for me)
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline Gypsy Baron

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 338
      • http://www.cris.com/~pstrogen
attention scenario players
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2006, 01:35:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saintaw
Booking 10 months in advance???Culero, get rid of those oestrogens dude!!!

Saw (planning 2 days ahead is too far ahead for me)



 Hummm....I begin to see why the attention span in AH scenarios is
 only 3 - 4 frames....

 Give me a good, well designed 12-frame scenario again like those we
 flew in AW. I do miss my 10-page "orders"... and briefing rooms :)

 Keep at it Kelly!

   =GB=
Gypsy Baron  AW CPID 4580
B-17G 447th Bomb Group, 709th Bomb Squadron, Serial#42-31225

Scheherazade - Lt.Phillip P. Zanoya, Pilot

M/Sgt Kenneth N. Johnson, Crew Chief
126 missions without a single mechanical abort[/b

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
attention scenario players
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2006, 03:45:49 PM »
The Times, they are a changing Saw :)

The level of detail in the planned events (take a peek at Stalins) Requires more detail at the beginning of the event and a deeper level of involvement through the design process.

When I announced the new team, I said "Brace Yourself"  :)
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline StarOfAfrica2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5162
      • http://www.vf-17.org
attention scenario players
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2006, 04:09:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ROC
The Times, they are a changing Saw :)

The level of detail in the planned events (take a peek at Stalins) Requires more detail at the beginning of the event and a deeper level of involvement through the design process.

When I announced the new team, I said "Brace Yourself"  :)


I thought you "retired"?  :D

Glad to see the rumors were exaggerated.  Scenarios just wouldnt be the same without you around.  :aok

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
attention scenario players
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2006, 04:18:20 PM »
Wouldn't be the same without you either :)

Hope to see you in Stalins!
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline Dead Man Flying

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6301
attention scenario players
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2006, 06:44:03 PM »
:t

Offline culero

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2528
attention scenario players
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2006, 07:50:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Saintaw
Booking 10 months in advance???Culero, get rid of those oestrogens dude!!!

Saw (planning 2 days ahead is too far ahead for me)


We're only booking the event development team. My SOP for scenarios is to have the COs as members of the event development team.

We'll probably book slots in the event somewhere around the end of October.

culero
“Before we're done with them, the Japanese language will be spoken only in Hell!” - Adm. William F. "Bull" Halsey

Offline Enduro

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 830
attention scenario players
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2006, 09:57:32 PM »
I nominate Saw for CO.  :huh

we might suck, but at least it'd be funny.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2006, 10:04:51 PM by Enduro »
TBolt
Last edited by hitech on 09-08-2004 at 10:51 AM for flaming everone.

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
attention scenario players
« Reply #9 on: February 20, 2006, 10:13:03 PM »
Wow, flying for Team Zeke looks like fun.

Offline doobs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1605
attention scenario players
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2006, 10:34:36 PM »
Lets see senario for Pearl  Harbor 10 months off, ya almost got it but not quite Dec 7 is a thursday, so I guess Dec 9th will be a day that live in infamy, for at least a couple more frames. We can finish Xmas weekend.
R.I.P JG44
(founding XO)

68KO always remembered

Offline ROC

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7700
attention scenario players
« Reply #11 on: February 20, 2006, 11:26:00 PM »
:O Culero!  Doobs is Brilliant!!   (gawd, did I say that?!?)

December 7th, Beta Test :D
ROC
Nothing clever here.  Please, move along.

Offline CHECKERS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1187
      • http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/1502/index.html
attention scenario players
« Reply #12 on: February 21, 2006, 08:16:37 AM »
:t
Originally posted by Panman
God the BK's are some some ugly mo-fo's. Please no more pictures, I'm going blind Bet your mothers don't even love ya cause u'all sooooooooo F******* ulgy.

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
attention scenario players
« Reply #13 on: February 21, 2006, 09:32:27 AM »
:t
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline Morpheus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10159
attention scenario players
« Reply #14 on: February 21, 2006, 09:42:01 AM »
:t
If you don't receive Jesus Christ, you don't receive the gift of righteousness.