Author Topic: packet loss  (Read 293 times)

Offline Konyotix

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
packet loss
« on: March 16, 2006, 06:04:00 PM »
Hey I ran pingplotter and I keep losing packets!!




I dont know why it says Lost= 0 (0.0%), because I lose packets to every HOP after the first one!!! I dont lose packets to them all at same time but it changes and I've lost to every hop after 1. :(
« Last Edit: March 16, 2006, 06:23:28 PM by Konyotix »

Offline Max

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7818
packet loss
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2006, 06:15:53 PM »
I think the ISP you're pinging is the one recently discontinued. The Main arena address I show is 206.16.60.39

Offline Konyotix

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
packet loss
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2006, 06:23:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Max
I think the ISP you're pinging is the one recently discontinued. The Main arena address I show is 206.16.60.39


Ah well, It dont matter!! I still lose packets

Target Name: N/A
         IP: 206.16.60.39
  Date/Time: 3/16/2006 6:22:06 PM

 1   15 ms   17 ms   12 ms   20 ms  ip68-102-32-1.ks.ok.cox.net [68.102.32.1]
 2   25 ms   18 ms   12 ms   20 ms  [68.103.127.198]
 3   *       13 ms    9 ms   11 ms  wichdsrj02gex070002.rd.ks.cox .net [70.183.71.13]
 4    8 ms   16 ms   16 ms   15 ms  wichbbrc02-pos0101.rd.ks.cox.net [68.1.1.182]
 5   *      185 ms  161 ms   19 ms  mtc1bbrc01-pos0200.rd.om.cox.net [68.1.1.177]
 6   19 ms   *       20 ms   20 ms  mtc1dsrj01-so000.rd.om.cox.net [68.1.0.125]
 7   33 ms   19 ms   22 ms   22 ms  [12.125.72.49]
 8   *       56 ms   50 ms   52 ms  tbr1-p010102.sl9mo.ip.att.net [12.122.82.18]
 9   50 ms   45 ms   59 ms   48 ms  tbr2-cl6.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.10.90]
10   46 ms  215 ms  100 ms   55 ms  gbr2-p100.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.12.82]
11   *       50 ms   45 ms   45 ms  gar1-p370.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.123.16.237]
12   46 ms   49 ms   55 ms   49 ms  mdf1-gsr12-2-pos-7-0.dal1.attens.net [12.122.255.170]
13   *       *       45 ms   47 ms  mdf1-bi8k-2-eth-1-2.dal1.attens.net [63.241.192.210]
14   46 ms   48 ms   47 ms   45 ms  [206.16.60.39]

Ping statistics for 206.16.60.39
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0.0%)
Round Trip Times: Minimum = 45ms, Maximum = 48ms, Average = 46ms

Lost packets through hops 2-14. :o

Offline Max

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7818
packet loss
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2006, 07:20:04 PM »
Something's up today for sure. Dunno if it's the internet in general or HTC's ISP.
Rest assured that Skuzzy's on the hunt for the problem.

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
packet loss
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2006, 07:29:32 PM »
where in oklahoma R U?  (edmond here)
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline Konyotix

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
packet loss
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2006, 07:38:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by WMLute
where in oklahoma R U?  (edmond here)


Wichita, KS. :D

Offline WMLute

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4512
packet loss
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2006, 05:02:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Konyotix
Wichita, KS. :D


eeeek... didn't see the ks in the 1st hop.  only saw the ok.cox.net bit.

I too have issues w/ cox in oklahoma.  I have been at war with them over my 2nd thru 4th hop for over a year now.  constant packet loss, and it's on THEIR network.

my bad.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity."
— George Patton

Absurdum est ut alios regat, qui seipsum regere nescit

Offline Skuzzy

  • Support Member
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31462
      • HiTech Creations Home Page
packet loss
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2006, 06:03:19 PM »
Actually, this issue is with Cox.
Roy "Skuzzy" Neese
support@hitechcreations.com

Offline Balsy

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 717
packet loss
« Reply #8 on: March 18, 2006, 08:49:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Skuzzy
Actually, this issue is with Cox.


Ah... sure blame it on the guys.